These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3562828)

  • 1. Light scanning versus mammography in breast cancer detection.
    Monsees B; Destouet JM; Totty WG
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):463-5. PubMed ID: 3562828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transillumination in breast cancer detection: screening failures and potential.
    Geslien GE; Fisher JR; DeLaney C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Mar; 144(3):619-22. PubMed ID: 3871574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diaphanography in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Drexler B; Davis JL; Schofield G
    Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 4034975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Light scan evaluation of nonpalpable breast lesions.
    Monsees B; Destouet JM; Gersell D
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):467-70. PubMed ID: 3031728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of mammography and transillumination light scanning in the detection of breast lesions.
    Gisvold JJ; Brown LR; Swee RG; Raygor DJ; Dickerson N; Ranfranz MK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jul; 147(1):191-4. PubMed ID: 3487216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infrared light scanning of the breast.
    Lafreniere R; Ashkar FS; Ketcham AS
    Am Surg; 1986 Mar; 52(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 3954258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast light scanning: a real-time breast-imaging modality.
    McIntosh DM
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Dec; 34(4):288-90. PubMed ID: 6668289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whole-breast US imaging: four-year follow-up.
    Kopans DB; Meyer JE; Lindfors KK
    Radiology; 1985 Nov; 157(2):505-7. PubMed ID: 3901112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
    Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography, sonomammography, and diaphanography (lightscanning). A prospective, comparative study with histologic correlation.
    Greene FL; Hicks C; Eddy V; Davis C
    Am Surg; 1985 Jan; 51(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 3881065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diaphanoscopy and diaphanography for breast cancer detection in clinical practice.
    Angquist KA; Holmlund D; Liliequist B; Lindqvist M; Salemark L
    Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 7324750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
    Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer diagnosis by laser transmission photo-scanning with spectro-analysis (report 4).
    He P; Kaneko M; Takai M; Baba K; Yamashita Y; Ohta K
    Radiat Med; 1990; 8(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 2374822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and self breast examination remain important in the era of modern screening.
    Ma I; Dueck A; Gray R; Wasif N; Giurescu M; Lorans R; Pizzitola V; Pockaj B
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 22160521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening for breast cancer: current recommendations and future directions.
    Knutson D; Steiner E
    Am Fam Physician; 2007 Jun; 75(11):1660-6. PubMed ID: 17575656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain.
    Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW
    Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.