233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35629010)
1. Reliability and Time Efficiency of Digital vs. Analog Bite Registration Technique for the Manufacture of Full-Arch Fixed Implant Prostheses.
Nuytens P; D'haese R; Vandeweghe S
J Clin Med; 2022 May; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 35629010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws.
Papaspyridakos P; De Souza A; Finkelman M; Sicilia E; Gotsis S; Chen YW; Vazouras K; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 35524647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication with double digital scanning: A retrospective study with 45 edentulous jaws.
Papaspyridakos P; Vazouras K; Gotsis S; Bokhary A; Sicilia E; Kudara Y; Bedrossian A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):571-578. PubMed ID: 36527731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel complete-arch pillar system (CAPS) to register implant position and maxillomandibular relationship in one single visit.
Nuytens P; Grande F; D'haese R; Salameh Z; Lepidi L
J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104885. PubMed ID: 38346663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reverse scan body: The scan pattern affects the fit of complete-arch prototype prostheses.
Papaspyridakos P; Bedrossian EA; Ntovas P; Kudara Y; Bokhary A; Chochlidakis K
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):186-191. PubMed ID: 37721306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using the surgical guide for impression-free digital bite registration in the edentulous maxilla-a technical note.
Michelinakis G; Nikolidakis D
Int J Implant Dent; 2019 May; 5(1):19. PubMed ID: 31115829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillary full-arch screw-retained prosthesis: A crossover randomized trial.
Jasim AG; Abo Elezz MG; Altonbary GY; Elsyad MA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38727015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrepancy of complete-arch titanium frameworks manufactured using selective laser melting and electron beam melting additive manufacturing technologies.
Revilla-León M; Ceballos L; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):942-947. PubMed ID: 30006219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trueness of 3-dimensionally printed complete arch implant analog casts.
Gagnon-Audet A; An H; Jensen UF; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37558526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of impression scan bodies for complete arch fixed implant-supported restorations.
Jeong M; Ishikawa-Nagai S; Lee JD; Lee SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38092618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P; Tsigarida A; Romeo D; Chen YW; Natto Z; Ercoli C
J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 32166793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
Eliasson A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (197):3-95. PubMed ID: 18652085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full-Arch, Screw-Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study.
Drago C
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):402-408. PubMed ID: 27416302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoral scanning and dental photogrammetry for full-arch implant-supported prosthesis: A technique.
Clozza E
Clin Adv Periodontics; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37921978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital workflow for implant-supported fixed complete dentures based on backwards planning in an edentulous patient.
Al-Haj Husain N; Molinero-Mourelle P; Janner SFM; Brägger U; Özcan M; Schimmel M; Revilla-Léon M; Abou-Ayash S
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 34006066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital Workflow for Double Complete Arch Zirconia Prostheses Utilizing a Novel Scan Body.
Marinis A; Papaspyridakos P; Sicilia E; Bernandes SR; Touloumi F; Chochlidakis K; Weber HP
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 34453373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Altered reverse impression method involving extraoral digitalization of a verification jig for the fabrication of implant-supported prosthesis by using a complete-digital workflow.
Rosmaninho A; Vedovato E; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):566-572. PubMed ID: 37882153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Superimposition of intraoral scans of an edentulous arch with implants and implant-supported provisional restoration, implementing a novel implant prosthetic scan body.
Ntovas P; Spanopoulou M; Martin W; Sykaras N
J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):475-480. PubMed ID: 36244761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrospective 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 20 Double Full-Arch Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Prostheses: Measurements and Recommendations for Optimal Design.
Rojas Vizcaya F
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):501-508. PubMed ID: 27570943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
