BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35629334)

  • 1. Self-Consistent Parameterization of DNA Residues for the Non-Polarizable AMBER Force Fields.
    Schneider AL; Albrecht AV; Huang K; Germann MW; Poon GMK
    Life (Basel); 2022 Apr; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35629334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.
    Jakalian A; Jack DB; Bayly CI
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Dec; 23(16):1623-41. PubMed ID: 12395429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AUTOMATED FORCE FIELD PARAMETERIZATION FOR NON-POLARIZABLE AND POLARIZABLE ATOMIC MODELS BASED ON
    Huang L; Roux B
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 24223528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The R.E.D. tools: advances in RESP and ESP charge derivation and force field library building.
    Dupradeau FY; Pigache A; Zaffran T; Savineau C; Lelong R; Grivel N; Lelong D; Rosanski W; Cieplak P
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 Jul; 12(28):7821-39. PubMed ID: 20574571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forcefield_PTM:
    Khoury GA; Thompson JP; Smadbeck J; Kieslich CA; Floudas CA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Dec; 9(12):5653-5674. PubMed ID: 24489522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing Improved Charge Sets for the Modeling of the KcsA K(+) Channel Using QM/MM Electrostatic Potentials.
    Bucher D; Guidoni L; Maurer P; Rothlisberger U
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Aug; 5(8):2173-9. PubMed ID: 26613156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent.
    Mobley DL; Dumont E; Chodera JD; Dill KA
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Mar; 111(9):2242-54. PubMed ID: 17291029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some practical approaches to treating electrostatic polarization of proteins.
    Ji C; Mei Y
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Sep; 47(9):2795-803. PubMed ID: 24883956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AMBER-DYES: Characterization of Charge Fluctuations and Force Field Parameterization of Fluorescent Dyes for Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Graen T; Hoefling M; Grubmüller H
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Dec; 10(12):5505-12. PubMed ID: 26583233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. W-RESP: Well-Restrained Electrostatic Potential-Derived Charges. Revisiting the Charge Derivation Model.
    Janeček M; Kührová P; Mlýnský V; Otyepka M; Šponer J; Banáš P
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jun; 17(6):3495-3509. PubMed ID: 33999623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Restrained electrostatic potential atomic partial charges for condensed-phase simulations of carbohydrates.
    Woods RJ; Chappelle R
    Theochem; 2000 Aug; 527(1-3):149-156. PubMed ID: 25309012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new force field (ECEPP-05) for peptides, proteins, and organic molecules.
    Arnautova YA; Jagielska A; Scheraga HA
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Mar; 110(10):5025-44. PubMed ID: 16526746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ff14ipq: A Self-Consistent Force Field for Condensed-Phase Simulations of Proteins.
    Cerutti DS; Swope WC; Rice JE; Case DA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Oct; 10(10):4515-4534. PubMed ID: 25328495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular dynamics simulations of a DMPC bilayer using nonadditive interaction models.
    Davis JE; Rahaman O; Patel S
    Biophys J; 2009 Jan; 96(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 19167291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partial Atomic Charges and Screened Charge Models of the Electrostatic Potential.
    Wang B; Truhlar DG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Jun; 8(6):1989-98. PubMed ID: 26593833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benchmarking Electronic Structure Methods for Accurate Fixed-Charge Electrostatic Models.
    Zhou A; Schauperl M; Nerenberg PS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jan; 60(1):249-258. PubMed ID: 31805237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuum treatment of electronic polarization effect.
    Tan YH; Luo R
    J Chem Phys; 2007 Mar; 126(9):094103. PubMed ID: 17362100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple AIMD approach to derive atomic charges for condensed phase simulation of ionic liquids.
    Zhang Y; Maginn EJ
    J Phys Chem B; 2012 Aug; 116(33):10036-48. PubMed ID: 22852554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polarized Protein-Specific Charges from Atoms-in-Molecule Electron Density Partitioning.
    Lee LP; Cole DJ; Skylaris CK; Jorgensen WL; Payne MC
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Jul; 9(7):2981-2991. PubMed ID: 23894231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploratory studies of ab initio protein structure prediction: multiple copy simulated annealing, AMBER energy functions, and a generalized born/solvent accessibility solvation model.
    Liu Y; Beveridge DL
    Proteins; 2002 Jan; 46(1):128-46. PubMed ID: 11746709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.