These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35629854)

  • 1. Separation of Drugs by Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes and Their Modelling.
    Nayak V; Cuhorka J; Mikulášek P
    Membranes (Basel); 2022 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35629854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removal of micropollutants from water by commercially available nanofiltration membranes.
    Cuhorka J; Wallace E; Mikulášek P
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 720():137474. PubMed ID: 32325567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modelling of arsenic (III) removal from aqueous solution using film theory combined Spiegler-Kedem model: pilot-scale study.
    Rajendran RM; Garg S; Bajpai S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(11):13886-13899. PubMed ID: 33205270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of atenolol from single and binary aqueous solutions by thin film composite nanofiltration membrane: Transport modeling and pore radius estimation.
    Taheri E; Hadi S; Amin MM; Ebrahimi A; Fatehizadeh A; Aminabhavi TM
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 271():111005. PubMed ID: 32778290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Separation of Cd and Ni from multicomponent aqueous solutions by nanofiltration and characterization of membrane using IT model.
    Chaudhari LB; Murthy ZV
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Aug; 180(1-3):309-15. PubMed ID: 20452729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of nanofiltration for the rejection of nickel ions from aqueous solutions and estimation of membrane transport parameters.
    Murthy ZV; Chaudhari LB
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Dec; 160(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 18400379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of Flux and Rejection Coefficients in the Removal of Emerging Pollutants Using a Nanofiltration Membrane.
    Hidalgo AM; Gómez M; Murcia MD; Gómez E; León G; Alfaro I
    Membranes (Basel); 2023 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 37999354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of landfill leachates by nanofiltration.
    Chaudhari LB; Murthy ZV
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1209-17. PubMed ID: 20149518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In-Situ Modification of Nanofiltration Membranes Using Carbon Nanotubes for Water Treatment.
    Vargas-Figueroa C; Pino-Soto L; Beratto-Ramos A; Tapiero Y; Rivas BL; Berrio ME; Melendrez MF; Bórquez RM
    Membranes (Basel); 2023 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37504982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of water matrix on the rejection of neutral pharmaceutically active compound by thin-film composite nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Shah IA; Ali S; Yang Z; Ihsanullah I; Huang H
    Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135211. PubMed ID: 35660049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling of lactic acid rejection from lactose in acidified cheese whey by nanofiltration.
    Casado-Coterillo C; Díaz-Guridi P; Otero JA; Ibáñez R
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Jul; 106(7):4533-4544. PubMed ID: 37225584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removal of Cd(II) ions from aqueous solution and industrial effluent using reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes.
    Kheriji J; Tabassi D; Hamrouni B
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(7):1206-16. PubMed ID: 26398037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation of Spiegler⁻Kedem and Steric Hindrance Pore Models for Analyzing Nanofiltration Membrane Performance for Smart Water Production.
    Nair RR; Protasova E; Strand S; Bilstad T
    Membranes (Basel); 2018 Sep; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 30200672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes.
    Jin X; Shan J; Wang C; Wei J; Tang CY
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Aug; 227-228():55-61. PubMed ID: 22640821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Achieving low concentrations of chromium in drinking water by nanofiltration: membrane performance and selection.
    Giagnorio M; Ruffino B; Grinic D; Steffenino S; Meucci L; Zanetti MC; Tiraferri A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):25294-25305. PubMed ID: 29946838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of solute-membrane affinity on rejection of uncharged organic solutes by nanofiltration membranes.
    Verliefde AR; Cornelissen ER; Heijman SG; Hoek EM; Amy GL; Van der Bruggen B; Van Dijkt JC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Apr; 43(7):2400-6. PubMed ID: 19452893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling nanofiltration of electrolyte solutions.
    Yaroshchuk A; Bruening ML; Zholkovskiy E
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2019 Jun; 268():39-63. PubMed ID: 30951927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal of trihalomethanes from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes.
    Uyak V; Koyuncu I; Oktem I; Cakmakci M; Toroz I
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Apr; 152(2):789-94. PubMed ID: 17768007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mass Transport of Dye Solutions through Porous Membrane Containing Tannic Acid/Fe
    Kinfu HH; Rahman MM; Cevallos-Cueva N; Abetz V
    Membranes (Basel); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36557122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.