These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35632091)

  • 21. Visual Multimedia Intelligent Computing System for Seismic Performance of Bridge Structure Based on Object-Oriented Technology.
    Zheng X; Xie Y
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():8250649. PubMed ID: 35694594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An integrated environment monitoring system for underground coal mines--Wireless Sensor Network subsystem with multi-parameter monitoring.
    Zhang Y; Yang W; Han D; Kim YI
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Jul; 14(7):13149-70. PubMed ID: 25051037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of scenario ensembles for deriving seismic risk.
    Robinson TR; Rosser NJ; Densmore AL; Oven KJ; Shrestha SN; Guragain R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Oct; 115(41):E9532-E9541. PubMed ID: 30249653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance Evaluation of Low-Cost Seismic Sensors for Dense Earthquake Early Warning: 2018⁻2019 Field Testing in Southwest China.
    Fu J; Li Z; Meng H; Wang J; Shan X
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Apr; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 31035635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty.
    Bommer JJ
    Bull Earthq Eng; 2022; 20(6):2825-3069. PubMed ID: 35474945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Empirical assessment of seismic design hazard's exceedance area.
    Iervolino I; Vitale A; Cito P
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):18803. PubMed ID: 34552190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of southern part of Ghana.
    Ahulu ST; Danuor SK; Asiedu DK
    J Seismol; 2018; 22(3):539-557. PubMed ID: 29755285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative risk analysis of oil storage facilities in seismic areas.
    Fabbrocino G; Iervolino I; Orlando F; Salzano E
    J Hazard Mater; 2005 Aug; 123(1-3):61-9. PubMed ID: 15908107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation method on seismic risk of substation in strong earthquake area.
    Cui J; Che A; Li S; Cheng Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0258792. PubMed ID: 34855758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A western gray whale mitigation and monitoring program for a 3-D seismic survey, Sakhalin Island, Russia.
    Johnson SR; Richardson WJ; Yazvenko SB; Blokhin SA; Gailey G; Jenkerson MR; Meier SK; Melton HR; Newcomer MW; Perlov AS; Rutenko SA; Würsig B; Martin CR; Egging DE
    Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Nov; 134(1-3):1-19. PubMed ID: 17657576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Urban Seismic Network Based on MEMS Sensors: The Experience of the Seismic Observatory in Camerino (Marche, Italy).
    Vitale G; D'Alessandro A; Di Benedetto A; Figlioli A; Costanzo A; Speciale S; Piattoni Q; Cipriani L
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 35746124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative analysis of the principal component analysis and entropy weight methods to establish the indexing measurement.
    Wu RMX; Zhang Z; Yan W; Fan J; Gou J; Liu B; Gide E; Soar J; Shen B; Fazal-E-Hasan S; Liu Z; Zhang P; Wang P; Cui X; Peng Z; Wang Y
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262261. PubMed ID: 35085274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Specific seismic retrofitting of a compact reinforced concrete building with X-bracings and steel jackets. Application to a primary school in Huelva.
    Romero-Sánchez E; Morales-Esteban A; Requena-García-Cruz MV; Zapico-Blanco B; de-Miguel-Rodríguez J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238505. PubMed ID: 32915839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Citation-related reliability analysis for a pilot sample of underground coal mines.
    Kinilakodi H; Grayson RL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21376896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Embankment seismic fragility assessment: A case study on Xi'an-Baoji expressway (China).
    Che F; Yin C; Zhao X; Hu Z; Sheng L; Liu D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246407. PubMed ID: 33544728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Characterization of Distant and Moderate Earthquakes with Inexpensive MEMS Sensors: Application to the M
    Cascone V; Boaga J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Locating induced earthquakes with a network of seismic stations in Oklahoma via a deep learning method.
    Zhang X; Zhang J; Yuan C; Liu S; Chen Z; Li W
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):1941. PubMed ID: 32029857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Local seismic network for monitoring of a potential nuclear power plant area.
    Tiira T; Uski M; Kortström J; Kaisko O; Korja A
    J Seismol; 2016; 20(2):397-417. PubMed ID: 28190964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Seismic analysis for translational failure of landfills with retaining walls.
    Feng SJ; Gao LY
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2065-73. PubMed ID: 20541389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.