These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35633152)

  • 21. Interrelated ecological impacts of climate change on an apex predator.
    Laidre KL; Atkinson S; Regehr EV; Stern HL; Born EW; Wiig Ø; Lunn NJ; Dyck M
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Jun; 30(4):e02071. PubMed ID: 31925853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spring fasting behavior in a marine apex predator provides an index of ecosystem productivity.
    Rode KD; Wilson RR; Douglas DC; Muhlenbruch V; Atwood TC; Regehr EV; Richardson ES; Pilfold NW; Derocher AE; Durner GM; Stirling I; Amstrup SC; St Martin M; Pagano AM; Simac K
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Jan; 24(1):410-423. PubMed ID: 28994242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models.
    Marrotte RR; Howe EJ; Beauclerc KB; Potter D; Northrup JM
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13490. PubMed ID: 35694380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models?
    Sollmann R; Gardner B; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34575. PubMed ID: 22539949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An Arctic predator-prey system in flux: climate change impacts on coastal space use by polar bears and ringed seals.
    Hamilton CD; Kovacs KM; Ims RA; Aars J; Lydersen C
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Sep; 86(5):1054-1064. PubMed ID: 28415134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A spatial capture-recapture model for group-living species.
    Emmet RL; Augustine BC; Abrahms B; Rich LN; Gardner B
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3576. PubMed ID: 34714927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accounting for phenology in the analysis of animal movement.
    Scharf HR; Hooten MB; Wilson RR; Durner GM; Atwood TC
    Biometrics; 2019 Sep; 75(3):810-820. PubMed ID: 30859552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations.
    Theng M; Milleret C; Bracis C; Cassey P; Delean S
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3676. PubMed ID: 35253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population.
    Kendall KC; Graves TA; Royle JA; Macleod AC; McKelvey KS; Boulanger J; Waller JS
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16804. PubMed ID: 31727927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abundance estimation for line transect sampling: A comparison of distance sampling and spatial capture-recapture models.
    Crum NJ; Neyman LC; Gowan TA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0252231. PubMed ID: 34048456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Conservation status of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in relation to projected sea-ice declines.
    Regehr EV; Laidre KL; Akçakaya HR; Amstrup SC; Atwood TC; Lunn NJ; Obbard M; Stern H; Thiemann GW; Wiig Ø
    Biol Lett; 2016 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 27928000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variation in the response of an Arctic top predator experiencing habitat loss: feeding and reproductive ecology of two polar bear populations.
    Rode KD; Regehr EV; Douglas DC; Durner G; Derocher AE; Thiemann GW; Budge SM
    Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Jan; 20(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 23913506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark-recapture studies.
    Gardner B; Royle JA; Wegan MT
    Ecology; 2009 Apr; 90(4):1106-15. PubMed ID: 19449704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Sun CC; Fuller AK; Royle JA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88025. PubMed ID: 24505361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Migration phenology and seasonal fidelity of an Arctic marine predator in relation to sea ice dynamics.
    Cherry SG; Derocher AE; Thiemann GW; Lunn NJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Jul; 82(4):912-21. PubMed ID: 23510081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A hierarchical model for estimating the spatial distribution and abundance of animals detected by continuous-time recorders.
    Dorazio RM; Karanth KU
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176966. PubMed ID: 28520796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Increased Arctic sea ice drift alters adult female polar bear movements and energetics.
    Durner GM; Douglas DC; Albeke SE; Whiteman JP; Amstrup SC; Richardson E; Wilson RR; Ben-David M
    Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Sep; 23(9):3460-3473. PubMed ID: 28586523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Polar bear population status in the northern Beaufort Sea, Canada, 1971-2006.
    Stirling I; McDonald TL; Richardson ES; Regehr EV; Amstrup SC
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Apr; 21(3):859-76. PubMed ID: 21639050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multiple observation processes in spatial capture-recapture models: How much do we gain?
    Tourani M; Dupont P; Nawaz MA; Bischof R
    Ecology; 2020 Jul; 101(7):e03030. PubMed ID: 32112415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Increased Land Use by Chukchi Sea Polar Bears in Relation to Changing Sea Ice Conditions.
    Rode KD; Wilson RR; Regehr EV; St Martin M; Douglas DC; Olson J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142213. PubMed ID: 26580809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.