These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1062 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35635015)

  • 1. Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
    Cross AJ; Robbins EC; Pack K; Stenson I; Kirby PL; Patel B; Rutter MD; Veitch AM; Saunders BP; Little M; Gray A; Duffy SW; Wooldrage K
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 May; 26(26):1-156. PubMed ID: 35635015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical effectiveness of different surveillance strategies to prevent colorectal cancer in people with intermediate-grade colorectal adenomas: a retrospective cohort analysis, and psychological and economic evaluations.
    Atkin W; Brenner A; Martin J; Wooldrage K; Shah U; Lucas F; Greliak P; Pack K; Kralj-Hans I; Thomson A; Perera S; Wood J; Miles A; Wardle J; Kearns B; Tappenden P; Myles J; Veitch A; Duffy SW
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Apr; 21(25):1-536. PubMed ID: 28621643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Cooper K; Squires H; Carroll C; Papaioannou D; Booth A; Logan RF; Maguire C; Hind D; Tappenden P
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 14(32):1-206. PubMed ID: 20594533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study.
    Atkin W; Wooldrage K; Brenner A; Martin J; Shah U; Perera S; Lucas F; Brown JP; Kralj-Hans I; Greliak P; Pack K; Wood J; Thomson A; Veitch A; Duffy SW; Cross AJ
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Jun; 18(6):823-834. PubMed ID: 28457708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtual chromoendoscopy for the real-time assessment of colorectal polyps in vivo: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Picot J; Rose M; Cooper K; Pickett K; Lord J; Harris P; Whyte S; Böhning D; Shepherd J
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Dec; 21(79):1-308. PubMed ID: 29271339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Removal of Adenomas During Screening Colonoscopies.
    Wieszczy P; Kaminski MF; Franczyk R; Loberg M; Kobiela J; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Rupinski M; Holme O; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Ransohoff D; Bretthauer M; Kalager M; Regula J
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Mar; 158(4):875-883.e5. PubMed ID: 31563625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Faecal immunochemical tests versus colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance: an accuracy, acceptability and economic study.
    Atkin W; Cross AJ; Kralj-Hans I; MacRae E; Piggott C; Pearson S; Wooldrage K; Brown J; Lucas F; Prendergast A; Marchevsky N; Patel B; Pack K; Howe R; Skrobanski H; Kerrison R; Swart N; Snowball J; Duffy SW; Morris S; von Wagner C; Halloran S
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jan; 23(1):1-84. PubMed ID: 30618357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(10):1-40. PubMed ID: 23074514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Medina-Lara A; Grigore B; Lewis R; Peters J; Price S; Landa P; Robinson S; Neal R; Hamilton W; Spencer AE
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Nov; 24(66):1-332. PubMed ID: 33252328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Meester RGS; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Knudsen AB; Ladabaum U
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 171(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 31546257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Hounsome J; Pilkington G; Mahon J; Boland A; Beale S; Kotas E; Renton T; Dickson R
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Jun; 24(30):1-116. PubMed ID: 32589125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heterogeneity in colorectal cancer incidence among people recommended 3-yearly surveillance post-polypectomy: a validation study.
    Robbins EC; Wooldrage K; Stenson I; Pack K; Duffy S; Weller D; Levin T; Conell C; Wright S; Nickerson C; Martin J; Cross AJ
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):402-410. PubMed ID: 32814350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.
    Anderson JC; Baron JA; Ahnen DJ; Barry EL; Bostick RM; Burke CA; Bresalier RS; Church TR; Cole BF; Cruz-Correa M; Kim AS; Mott LA; Sandler RS; Robertson DJ
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jun; 152(8):1933-1943.e5. PubMed ID: 28219690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Colorectal cancer risk following polypectomy in a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study: an evaluation of the 2020 UK post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines.
    Cross AJ; Robbins EC; Pack K; Stenson I; Patel B; Rutter MD; Veitch AM; Saunders BP; Duffy SW; Wooldrage K
    Gut; 2021 Dec; 70(12):2307-2320. PubMed ID: 33674342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal surveillance strategies for patients with stage 1 cutaneous melanoma post primary tumour excision: three systematic reviews and an economic model.
    Vale L; Kunonga P; Coughlan D; Kontogiannis V; Astin M; Beyer F; Richmond C; Wilson D; Bajwa D; Javanbakht M; Bryant A; Akor W; Craig D; Lovat P; Labus M; Nasr B; Cunliffe T; Hinde H; Shawgi M; Saleh D; Royle P; Steward P; Lucas R; Ellis R
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Nov; 25(64):1-178. PubMed ID: 34792018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colonoscopist Performance and Colorectal Cancer Risk After Adenoma Removal to Stratify Surveillance: Two Nationwide Observational Studies.
    Wieszczy P; Waldmann E; Løberg M; Regula J; Rupinski M; Bugajski M; Gray K; Kalager M; Ferlitsch M; Kaminski MF; Bretthauer M
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Mar; 160(4):1067-1074.e6. PubMed ID: 33065063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma incidence during post-polypectomy surveillance: a national cohort study in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
    Bonnington SN; Hungin APS; Nickerson C; Wright S; Sharp L; Rutter MD
    Endoscopy; 2023 Aug; 55(8):740-753. PubMed ID: 37185968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and cost effectiveness of endoscopic bipolar radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review.
    Beyer F; Rice S; Orozco-Leal G; Still M; O'Keefe H; O'Connor N; Stoniute A; Craig D; Pereira S; Carr L; Leeds J
    Health Technol Assess; 2023 May; 27(7):1-118. PubMed ID: 37212444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endovascular stent grafting and open surgical replacement for chronic thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and prospective cohort study.
    Sharples L; Sastry P; Freeman C; Gray J; McCarthy A; Chiu YD; Bicknell C; McMeekin P; Vallabhaneni SR; Cook A; Vale L; Large S
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 Jan; 26(6):1-166. PubMed ID: 35094747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.