These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35635608)

  • 41. Impact of Time-of-Flight and Point-Spread-Function for Respiratory Artifact Reduction in PET/CT Imaging: Focus on Standardized Uptake Value.
    Sharifpour R; Ghafarian P; Bakhshayesh-Karam M; Jamaati H; Ay MR
    Tanaffos; 2017; 16(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 29308077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Head-to-head Intra-individual Comparison of [
    Novruzov E; Dendl K; Ndlovu H; Choyke PL; Dabir M; Beu M; Novruzov F; Mehdi E; Guliyev F; Koerber SA; Lawal I; Niegisch G; Debus J; Haberkorn U; Sathekge M; Giesel FL
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Aug; 24(4):651-658. PubMed ID: 35349039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [F-18]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography after limb salvage surgery: post-surgical appearance, attenuation correction and local complications.
    Gelfand MJ; Sharp SE
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Jul; 45(8):1182-8. PubMed ID: 25721581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of furosemide administration before F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography on urine radioactivity and detection of uterine cervical cancer.
    d'Amico A; Gorczewska I; Gorczewski K; Turska-d'Amico M; Di Pietro M
    Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2014; 17(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 25088107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac FDG PET on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner: comparison with standard CT attenuation correction.
    Vontobel J; Liga R; Possner M; Clerc OF; Mikulicic F; Veit-Haibach P; Ter Voert EE; Fuchs TA; Stehli J; Pazhenkottil AP; Benz DC; Gräni C; Gaemperli O; Herzog B; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(10):1574-80. PubMed ID: 26091704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Diagnostic performance of
    Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Yano H; Gohda Y; Shuno Y
    Cancer Imaging; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29378659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system.
    Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Hao X; Wu P; Zhao B; Qin Z; Xie J; Li S
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10328. PubMed ID: 33990659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Differences in edge artifacts between 68Ga- and 18F-PET images reconstructed using point spread function correction.
    Amakusa S; Matsuoka K; Baba S; Yoshida T; Sasaki M
    Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 31469808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of
    Jiménez-Ballvé A; Pérez-Castejón MJ; Delgado-Bolton RC; Sánchez-Enrique C; Vilacosta I; Vivas D; Olmos C; Ferrer ME; Carreras-Delgado JL
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2401-2412. PubMed ID: 27596984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Effect of Susceptibility Artifacts Related to Metallic Implants on Adjacent-Lesion Assessment in Simultaneous TOF PET/MR.
    Svirydenka H; Delso G; De Galiza Barbosa F; Huellner M; Davison H; Fanti S; Veit-Haibach P; Ter Voert EEGW
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 58(7):1167-1173. PubMed ID: 28062597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Influence of Reconstruction FOV and Matrix Size on the Quantitative Accuracy of FDG-PET: Comparison between OSEM and Bayesian Penalized Likelihood].
    Mikami S; Nakamura F; Nakamura A; Torizuka T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(5):454-462. PubMed ID: 34011788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
    Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of scatter limitation correction: a new method of correcting photopenic artifacts caused by patient motion during whole-body PET/CT imaging.
    Miwa K; Umeda T; Murata T; Wagatsuma K; Miyaji N; Terauchi T; Koizumi M; Sasaki M
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Feb; 37(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 26440565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.
    Mehranian A; Zaidi H
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):635-41. PubMed ID: 25745090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. False negative rate at
    Gouy S; Seebacher V; Chargari C; Terroir M; Grimaldi S; Ilenko A; Maulard A; Genestie C; Leary A; Pautier P; Morice P; Deandreis D
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):135. PubMed ID: 33549033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of Reconstruction Algorithms to Validate the NEMA Phantom Results in Clinical Scenario - A Comparative Study Using Time-of-Flight versus Non-Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography Imaging.
    Kumar A; Jacob P; Watts A; Joseph A; Kaur H; Hooda M; Kaur A; Singh B
    Indian J Nucl Med; 2022; 37(2):113-120. PubMed ID: 35982821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Recurrent bladder carcinoma: clinical and prognostic role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT.
    Alongi P; Caobelli F; Gentile R; Stefano A; Russo G; Albano D; Baldari S; Gilardi MC; Midiri M
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Feb; 44(2):224-233. PubMed ID: 27565154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Relationship between CT Numbers and Artifacts Obtained Using CT-based Attenuation Correction of PET/CT].
    Watanabe Y; Hosokawa S; Otaka Y; Takahashi Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(9):955-962. PubMed ID: 32963141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Prone position [
    Lee HJ; Son HJ; Yun M; Moon JW; Kim YN; Woo JY; Lee SH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4606-4614. PubMed ID: 33852046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact of different iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) algorithms on PET/CT attenuation correction after port implementation.
    Martin O; Boos J; Aissa J; Vay C; Heusch P; Gaspers S; Antke C; Sedlmair M; Antoch G; Schaarschmidt BM
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 129():109065. PubMed ID: 32485336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.