172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35635799)
1. Automatic treatment planning for cervical cancer radiation therapy using direct three-dimensional patient anatomy match.
Zhang D; Yuan Z; Hu P; Yang Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e13649. PubMed ID: 35635799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic dose prediction using deep learning and plan optimization with finite-element control for intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Shen Y; Tang X; Lin S; Jin X; Ding J; Shao M
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):545-555. PubMed ID: 37748133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tree-based exploration of the optimization objectives for automatic cervical cancer IMRT treatment planning.
Wang H; Wang R; Liu J; Zhang J; Yao K; Yue H; Zhang Y; You J; Wu H
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20210214. PubMed ID: 34111955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning for Cervical Cancer Based on Convolution Neural Network.
Jihong C; Penggang B; Xiuchun Z; Kaiqiang C; Wenjuan C; Yitao D; Jiewei Q; Kerun Q; Jing Z; Tianming W
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820957002. PubMed ID: 33016230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose Prediction Models Based on Geometric and Plan Optimization Parameter for Adjuvant Radiotherapy Planning Design in Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy.
Tang H; Chen Y; Jiang J; Li K; Zeng J; Hu Z; Yin R
J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():7026098. PubMed ID: 34804459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deformable image registration-based contour propagation yields clinically acceptable plans for MRI-based cervical cancer brachytherapy planning.
Chapman CH; Polan D; Vineberg K; Jolly S; Maturen KE; Brock KK; Prisciandaro JI
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(2):360-367. PubMed ID: 29331573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attention-aware 3D U-Net convolutional neural network for knowledge-based planning 3D dose distribution prediction of head-and-neck cancer.
Osman AFI; Tamam NM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 23(7):e13630. PubMed ID: 35533234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contour similarity and its implication on inverse prostate SBRT treatment planning.
Yan C; Guo B; Tendulkar R; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 24(2):e13809. PubMed ID: 36300837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Target miss using PTV-based IMRT compared to robust optimization via coverage probability concept in prostate cancer.
Outaggarts Z; Wegener D; Berger B; Zips D; Paulsen F; Bleif M; Thorwarth D; Alber M; Dohm O; Müller AC
Acta Oncol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):911-917. PubMed ID: 32436467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An integrated strategy of biological and physical constraints in biological optimization for cervical carcinoma.
Feng Z; Tao C; Zhu J; Chen J; Yu G; Qin S; Yin Y; Li D
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 12(1):64. PubMed ID: 28376900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Dose Prediction Models for Cervical Cancer Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.
Wu Z; Liu M; Pang Y; Deng L; Yang Y; Wu Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2024; 23():15330338241242654. PubMed ID: 38584413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.
Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semiautomated head-and-neck IMRT planning using dose warping and scaling to robustly adapt plans in a knowledge database containing potentially suboptimal plans.
Schmidt M; Lo JY; Grzetic S; Lutzky C; Brizel DM; Das SK
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4428-34. PubMed ID: 26233173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individualized nonadaptive and online-adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment strategies for cervical cancer patients based on pretreatment acquired variable bladder filling computed tomography scans.
Bondar ML; Hoogeman MS; Mens JW; Quint S; Ahmad R; Dhawtal G; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):1617-23. PubMed ID: 22270164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of dose-volume histogram prediction for organ-at risk and planning target volume based on machine learning.
Jiao SX; Wang ML; Chen LX; Liu XW
Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3117. PubMed ID: 33542427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A knowledge-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning technique for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy.
Bai P; Weng X; Quan K; Chen J; Dai Y; Xu Y; Lin F; Zhong J; Wu T; Chen C
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Aug; 15(1):188. PubMed ID: 32746873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
