300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35635920)
1. Ultrafiltration significantly increased the scaling potential of municipal secondary effluent on reverse osmosis membranes.
Tong X; Zhang ZW; Wu YH; Bai Y; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Hu HY
Water Res; 2022 Jul; 220():118672. PubMed ID: 35635920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Smart ultrafiltration membrane fouling control as desalination pretreatment of shale gas fracturing wastewater: The effects of backwash water.
Chang H; Li T; Liu B; Chen C; He Q; Crittenden JC
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104869. PubMed ID: 31228783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal characteristics of dissolved organic matter and membrane fouling in ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane combined processes treating the secondary effluent of wastewater treatment plant.
Liu J; Zhao M; Duan C; Yue P; Li T
Water Sci Technol; 2021 Feb; 83(3):689-700. PubMed ID: 33600372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advanced treatment of textile dyeing secondary effluent using magnetic anion exchange resin and its effect on organic fouling in subsequent RO membrane.
Yang C; Li L; Shi J; Long C; Li A
J Hazard Mater; 2015 Mar; 284():50-7. PubMed ID: 25463217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.
Tay MF; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():180-189. PubMed ID: 29149673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of feed solution characteristics and membrane fouling on the removal of THMs by UF/NF/RO membranes.
Fang C; Ou T; Wang X; Rui M; Chu W
Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 260():127625. PubMed ID: 32758776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of seawater reverse osmosis fouling and its relationship to pretreatment type.
Kumar M; Adham SS; Pearce WR
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Mar; 40(6):2037-44. PubMed ID: 16570633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation.
Kim J; DiGiano FA; Reardon RD
Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 17961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) removal efficiency by a combination of coagulation and ultrafiltration to minimize SWRO membrane fouling.
Li S; Lee ST; Sinha S; Leiknes T; Amy GL; Ghaffour N
Water Res; 2016 Oct; 102():485-493. PubMed ID: 27403871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fouling characteristics of reverse osmosis membranes at different positions of a full-scale plant for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Tang F; Hu HY; Sun LJ; Sun YX; Shi N; Crittenden JC
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():329-336. PubMed ID: 26760485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Coagulation-Integrated Sand Filtration and Ultrafiltration for Seawater Reverse Osmosis Pretreatment.
Li Q; Xie L; Xu S; Zhang W
Membranes (Basel); 2024 May; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 38921492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adsorption combined with ultrafiltration to remove organic matter from seawater.
Tansakul C; Laborie S; Cabassud C
Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6362-70. PubMed ID: 21996607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polishing Step Purification of High-Strength Wastewaters by Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis.
Zhou J; Baker BO; Grimsley CT; Husson SM
Membranes (Basel); 2016 Mar; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 26978407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Different bacterial species and their extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) significantly affected reverse osmosis (RO) membrane fouling potentials in wastewater reclamation.
Yu T; Sun H; Chen Z; Wang YH; Huo ZY; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Jin Y; Hu HY; Wu YH; Lu Y
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 644():486-493. PubMed ID: 29990899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient direct membrane filtration (DMF) of municipal wastewater for carbon recovery: Application of a simple pretreatment and selection of an appropriate membrane pore size.
Sugiyama T; Ito Y; Hafuka A; Kimura K
Water Res; 2022 Aug; 221():118810. PubMed ID: 35834972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A pilot-scale hybrid municipal wastewater reclamation system using combined coagulation and disk filtration, ultrafiltration, and reverse osmosis: removal of nutrients and micropollutants, and characterization of membrane foulants.
Chon K; Cho J; Shon HK
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Aug; 141():109-16. PubMed ID: 23611699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
