214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35636977)
1. FDG-PET/CT for Primary Staging and Detection of Recurrence of Breast Cancer.
Groheux D
Semin Nucl Med; 2022 Sep; 52(5):508-519. PubMed ID: 35636977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer: initial workup and staging with FDG PET/CT.
Groheux D; Hindie E
Clin Transl Imaging; 2021; 9(3):221-231. PubMed ID: 33937141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whole-body
Gajjala SR; Hulikal N; Kadiyala S; Kottu R; Kalawat T
Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 29923514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in recurrent breast carcinoma.
Manohar K; Mittal BR; Senthil R; Kashyap R; Bhattacharya A; Singh G
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jun; 33(6):591-6. PubMed ID: 22334135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with clinical stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA breast cancer: a prospective study.
Groheux D; Giacchetti S; Espié M; Vercellino L; Hamy AS; Delord M; Berenger N; Toubert ME; Misset JL; Hindié E
J Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 52(10):1526-34. PubMed ID: 21880576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary tumor visualization and staging in T1 breast cancer.
Koolen BB; van der Leij F; Vogel WV; Rutgers EJ; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Elkhuizen PH; Valdés Olmos RA
Acta Oncol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 23672678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-body FDG PET/CT is more accurate than conventional imaging for staging primary breast cancer patients.
Riegger C; Herrmann J; Nagarajah J; Hecktor J; Kuemmel S; Otterbach F; Hahn S; Bockisch A; Lauenstein T; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 May; 39(5):852-63. PubMed ID: 22392069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in low 18F-FDG-avidity breast cancer subtypes: comparison with breast US and MRI.
Park HL; Yoo IR; O JH; Kim H; Kim SH; Kang BJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 28984814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for systemic staging of newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer.
Ulaner GA; Castillo R; Goldman DA; Wills J; Riedl CC; Pinker-Domenig K; Jochelson MS; Gönen M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Oct; 43(11):1937-44. PubMed ID: 27129866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting the accuracy of
Kutluturk K; Simsek A; Comak A; Gonultas F; Unal B; Kekilli E
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 22(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 30666022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT findings in clinical stage III and IIB breast cancer.
Groheux D; Hindié E; Delord M; Giacchetti S; Hamy AS; de Bazelaire C; de Roquancourt A; Vercellino L; Toubert ME; Merlet P; Espié M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Dec; 104(24):1879-87. PubMed ID: 23243198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
Ulaner GA; Castillo R; Wills J; Gönen M; Goldman DA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Aug; 44(9):1420-1427. PubMed ID: 28456837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Systemic Staging of Newly Diagnosed Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
Hogan MP; Goldman DA; Dashevsky B; Riedl CC; Gönen M; Osborne JR; Jochelson M; Hudis C; Morrow M; Ulaner GA
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1674-80. PubMed ID: 26294295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of FDG PET/CT in patients with locoregional breast cancer recurrence: a comparison to conventional imaging techniques.
Aukema TS; Rutgers EJ; Vogel WV; Teertstra HJ; Oldenburg HS; Vrancken Peeters MT; Wesseling J; Russell NS; Valdés Olmos RA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19962268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of breast cancer.
Groheux D; Espié M; Giacchetti S; Hindié E
Radiology; 2013 Feb; 266(2):388-405. PubMed ID: 23220901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic impact of
Arslan E; Çermik TF; Didem Can Trabulus F; Canan Kelten Talu E; Başaran Ş
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(3):147-153. PubMed ID: 30914287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast Cancer Systemic Staging (Comparison of Computed Tomography, Bone Scan, and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography).
Groheux D
PET Clin; 2023 Oct; 18(4):503-515. PubMed ID: 37268506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in the diagnosis of tumor recurrence and metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast carcinoma: a comparison to conventional imaging.
Gallowitsch HJ; Kresnik E; Gasser J; Kumnig G; Igerc I; Mikosch P; Lind P
Invest Radiol; 2003 May; 38(5):250-6. PubMed ID: 12750613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.
Riegger C; Koeninger A; Hartung V; Otterbach F; Kimmig R; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Dec; 53(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 23002144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
