These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35637560)

  • 1. Verification of Attenuation for Premolded Hearing Protection Devices Designed for Music.
    Zaccardi TA; Portnuff CD; Le Prell CG
    Med Probl Perform Art; 2022 Jun; 37(2):78-88. PubMed ID: 35637560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary Investigation of Perceived Sound Quality for High-Fidelity Premolded Hearing Protection Devices.
    Zaccardi TA; Portnuff CD; Le Prell CG
    Med Probl Perform Art; 2023 Mar; 38(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 36854969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of hearing protection device effectiveness for musicians.
    Crawford K; Willenbring K; Nothwehr F; Fleckenstein S; Anthony TR
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 62(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 35143376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of clinical techniques for verification of uniform attenuation earplugs.
    Portnuff CDF; Price D
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Feb; 58(sup1):S33-S39. PubMed ID: 30618313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The study of attenuation levels and the comfort of earplugs.
    Samelli AG; Gomes RF; Chammas TV; Silva BG; Moreira RR; Fiorini AC
    Noise Health; 2018; 20(94):112-119. PubMed ID: 29785976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods.
    Karch SJ; Federman J; Ginsberg JT; Qureshi I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of user volume control settings for portable music players with three earphone configurations in quiet and noisy environments.
    Henry P; Foots A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 22436116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of training format on earplug performance.
    Joseph A; Punch J; Stephenson M; Paneth N; Wolfe E; Murphy W
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Oct; 46(10):609-18. PubMed ID: 17922350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Musician earplugs: Appreciation and protection.
    Bockstael A; Keppler H; Botteldooren D
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(77):198-208. PubMed ID: 26168950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A clinical trial of active hearing protection for orchestral musicians.
    O'Brien I; Driscoll T; Williams W; Ackermann B
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(7):450-9. PubMed ID: 24433326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing Health in College Instrumental Musicians and Prevention of Hearing Loss.
    Olson AD; Gooding LF; Shikoh F; Graf J
    Med Probl Perform Art; 2016 Mar; 31(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 26966962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
    Giguère C; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data.
    Schroeter J; Poesselt C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):505-27. PubMed ID: 3745683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A controlled investigation of in-field attenuation performance of selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors.
    Park MY; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1991 Dec; 33(6):693-714. PubMed ID: 1800294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Tester to Evaluate the Correct Placement of Earplugs.
    Kozlowski E; Mlynski R; Morzynski L; Swidzinski A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.