216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35638090)
41. 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography-Based Primary Staging and Histological Correlation after Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Kopp D; Kopp J; Bernhardt E; Manka L; Beck A; Gerullis H; Karakiewicz PI; Salomon G; Wiggermann P; Hammerer P; Schiffmann J
Urol Int; 2022; 106(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 33965965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Diagnostic accuracy of
Coşar U; Şen İ; Aydos U; Koparal MY; Uçar M; Tokgöz N; Gönül İI; Akdemir ÜÖ; Atay LÖ; Sözen TS
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Aug; 75(8):e14287. PubMed ID: 33931929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer.
Yilmaz B; Turkay R; Colakoglu Y; Baytekin HF; Ergul N; Sahin S; Tugcu V; Inci E; Tasci AI; Cermik TF
Prostate; 2019 Jun; 79(9):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 31012125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography with Gallium-68-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Detects Relapse After Vascular-targeted Photodynamic Therapy in a Prostate Cancer Model.
Alvim R; Nagar K; Das S; Lebdai S; Wong N; Somma A; Hughes C; Thomas J; Monette S; Scherz A; Kim K; Grimm J; Coleman JA
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):472-478. PubMed ID: 31227464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Value of 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET for the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence: Comparison with Histopathology After Salvage Lymphadenectomy.
Rauscher I; Maurer T; Beer AJ; Graner FP; Haller B; Weirich G; Doherty A; Gschwend JE; Schwaiger M; Eiber M
J Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1713-1719. PubMed ID: 27261524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Gallium 68 PSMA-11 PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Park SY; Zacharias C; Harrison C; Fan RE; Kunder C; Hatami N; Giesel F; Ghanouni P; Daniel B; Loening AM; Sonn GA; Iagaru A
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):495-505. PubMed ID: 29786490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47.
Yılmaz B; Şahin S; Ergül N; Çolakoğlu Y; Baytekin HF; Sökmen D; Tuğcu V; Taşçı Aİ; Çermik TF
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Jul; 36(7):597-609. PubMed ID: 35426599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Outcomes of Primary Lymph Node Staging of Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer with
Yaxley JW; Raveenthiran S; Nouhaud FX; Samartunga H; Yaxley AJ; Coughlin G; Delahunt B; Egevad L; McEwan L; Wong D
J Urol; 2019 Apr; 201(4):815-820. PubMed ID: 30672842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Modelling Study with an Interactive Model Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of
Scholte M; Barentsz JO; Sedelaar JPM; Gotthardt M; Grutters JPC; Rovers MM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):967-974. PubMed ID: 30826284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clinical parameters and nomograms for predicting lymph node metastasis detected with
Onal C; Ozyigit G; Oymak E; Guler OC; Hurmuz P; Tilki B; Reyhan M; Tuncel M; Akyol F
Prostate; 2021 Jul; 81(10):648-656. PubMed ID: 33949694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Detection and localisation of primary prostate cancer using
Kalapara AA; Nzenza T; Pan HYC; Ballok Z; Ramdave S; O'Sullivan R; Ryan A; Cherk M; Hofman MS; Konety BR; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D; Murphy DG; Grummet JP; Frydenberg M
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 31260602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Is Associated with Improved Oncological Outcome in Men Treated with Salvage Radiation Therapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Meijer D; Eppinga WSC; Mohede RM; Vanneste BGL; Meijnen P; Meijer OWM; Daniels LA; van den Bergh RCN; Lont AP; Ettema RH; Oudshoorn FHK; van Leeuwen PJ; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Oprea-Lager DE; Schaake EE; Vis AN
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):146-152. PubMed ID: 35074282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53.
Dekalo S; Kuten J; Campbell J; Mintz I; Bar-Yosef Y; Keizman D; Sarid D; Even-Sapir E; Yossepowitch O; Mano R
Can Urol Assoc J; 2022 Jul; 16(7):E381-E385. PubMed ID: 35230941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Diagnostic Accuracy of
Cantiello F; Gangemi V; Cascini GL; Calabria F; Moschini M; Ferro M; Musi G; Butticè S; Salonia A; Briganti A; Damiano R
Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():139-145. PubMed ID: 28438628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictors of Positive
Perera M; Papa N; Christidis D; Wetherell D; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Bolton D; Lawrentschuk N
Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):926-937. PubMed ID: 27363387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of
Zhang Q; Zang S; Zhang C; Fu Y; Lv X; Zhang Q; Deng Y; Zhang C; Luo R; Zhao X; Wang W; Wang F; Guo H
J Transl Med; 2017 Nov; 15(1):230. PubMed ID: 29115970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57.
Klingenberg S; Jochumsen MR; Ulhøi BP; Fredsøe J; Sørensen KD; Borre M; Bouchelouche K
J Nucl Med; 2021 Feb; 62(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 32444374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58.
Maurer T; Robu S; Schottelius M; Schwamborn K; Rauscher I; van den Berg NS; van Leeuwen FWB; Haller B; Horn T; Heck MM; Gschwend JE; Schwaiger M; Wester HJ; Eiber M
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):659-666. PubMed ID: 29625755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Diagnostic Performance of
Wu H; Xu T; Wang X; Yu YB; Fan ZY; Li DX; Luo L; Yang XC; Jiao W; Niu HT
World J Mens Health; 2020 Apr; 38(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 31081294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and
Sawicki LM; Kirchner J; Buddensieck C; Antke C; Ullrich T; Schimmöller L; Boos J; Schleich C; Schaarschmidt BM; Buchbender C; Heusch P; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Müller HW; Hautzel H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1542-1550. PubMed ID: 30879122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
