These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35638387)

  • 1. Land-based climate solutions for the United States.
    Robertson GP; Hamilton SK; Paustian K; Smith P
    Glob Chang Biol; 2022 Aug; 28(16):4912-4919. PubMed ID: 35638387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Climate change mitigation potentials of biofuels produced from perennial crops and natural regrowth on abandoned and degraded cropland in Nordic countries.
    Næss JS; Hu X; Gvein MH; Iordan CM; Cavalett O; Dorber M; Giroux B; Cherubini F
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt A):116474. PubMed ID: 36274301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carbon sequestration in European croplands.
    Smith P; Falloon P
    SEB Exp Biol Ser; 2005; ():47-55. PubMed ID: 17633030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent Land Use Change to Agriculture in the U.S. Lake States: Impacts on Cellulosic Biomass Potential and Natural Lands.
    Mladenoff DJ; Sahajpal R; Johnson CP; Rothstein DE
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148566. PubMed ID: 26866474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural climate solutions versus bioenergy: Can carbon benefits of natural succession compete with bioenergy from short rotation coppice?
    Kalt G; Mayer A; Theurl MC; Lauk C; Erb KH; Haberl H
    Glob Change Biol Bioenergy; 2019 Nov; 11(11):1283-1297. PubMed ID: 31762785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Models of reforestation productivity and carbon sequestration for land use and climate change adaptation planning in South Australia.
    Hobbs TJ; Neumann CR; Meyer WS; Moon T; Bryan BA
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Oct; 181():279-288. PubMed ID: 27372250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Embedding nature-based solutions into the social cost of carbon.
    Han W; Chen WY
    Environ Int; 2022 Sep; 167():107431. PubMed ID: 35926262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.
    Graves RA; Haugo RD; Holz A; Nielsen-Pincus M; Jones A; Kellogg B; Macdonald C; Popper K; Schindel M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230424. PubMed ID: 32275725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land-based climate-change mitigation efforts.
    Krause A; Pugh TAM; Bayer AD; Li W; Leung F; Bondeau A; Doelman JC; Humpenöder F; Anthoni P; Bodirsky BL; Ciais P; Müller C; Murray-Tortarolo G; Olin S; Popp A; Sitch S; Stehfest E; Arneth A
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Jul; 24(7):3025-3038. PubMed ID: 29569788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Future climate impacts on forest growth and implications for carbon sequestration through reforestation in southeast Australia.
    Wang B; Waters C; Anwar MR; Cowie A; Liu L; Summers D; Paul K; Feng P
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 302(Pt A):113964. PubMed ID: 34678538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States.
    McKinley DC; Ryan MG; Birdsey RA; Giardina CP; Harmon ME; Heath LS; Houghton RA; Jackson RB; Morrison JF; Murray BC; Patakl DE; Skog KE
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1902-24. PubMed ID: 21939033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Large climate mitigation potential from adding trees to agricultural lands.
    Chapman M; Walker WS; Cook-Patton SC; Ellis PW; Farina M; Griscom BW; Baccini A
    Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Aug; 26(8):4357-4365. PubMed ID: 32301542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opportunities for forest sector emissions reductions: a state-level analysis.
    Dugan AJ; Lichstein JW; Steele A; Metsaranta JM; Bick S; Hollinger DY
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Jul; 31(5):e02327. PubMed ID: 33742488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States.
    Baik E; Sanchez DL; Turner PA; Mach KJ; Field CB; Benson SM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(13):3290-3295. PubMed ID: 29531081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trade-offs for food production, nature conservation and climate limit the terrestrial carbon dioxide removal potential.
    Boysen LR; Lucht W; Gerten D
    Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Oct; 23(10):4303-4317. PubMed ID: 28464416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wood Vault: remove atmospheric CO
    Zeng N; Hausmann H
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2022 Apr; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 35362755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systems approach to assess climate change mitigation options in landscapes of the United States forest sector.
    Dugan AJ; Birdsey R; Mascorro VS; Magnan M; Smyth CE; Olguin M; Kurz WA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 30182168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reforestation with native mixed-species plantings in a temperate continental climate effectively sequesters and stabilizes carbon within decades.
    Cunningham SC; Cavagnaro TR; Mac Nally R; Paul KI; Baker PJ; Beringer J; Thomson JR; Thompson RM
    Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Apr; 21(4):1552-66. PubMed ID: 25230693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Carbon sequestration potential and soil characteristics of various land use systems in arid region.
    Hammad HM; Fasihuddin Nauman HM; Abbas F; Ahmad A; Bakhat HF; Saeed S; Shah GM; Ahmad A; Cerdà A
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 264():110254. PubMed ID: 32364955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal bioenergy power generation for climate change mitigation with or without carbon sequestration.
    Woolf D; Lehmann J; Lee DR
    Nat Commun; 2016 Oct; 7():13160. PubMed ID: 27767177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.