183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35639042)
1. Evaluation of the quality of information online for arthroscopic Bankart repair.
Shazil Jamal M; Hurley ET; Davey MS; Asad H; Gaafar M; Mullett H
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 May; 105(5):394-399. PubMed ID: 35639042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Quality Assessment of the Information Accessible to Patients on the Internet About the Whipple Procedure.
Khachfe HH; Chahrour MA; Habib JR; Yu J; Jamali FR
World J Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(6):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 33580299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.
Alpaydın MT; Buyuk SK; Canigur Bavbek N
J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34269827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality and readability of online patient information on the left ventricular assist device.
Rouhi AD; Han JJ; Ghanem YK; Pervaiz SS; Suarez-Pierre A; Choudhury RA; Bermudez CA; Williams NN; Dumon KR
Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 36478254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ankle conFUSION: The quality and readability of information on the internet relating to ankle arthrodesis.
Irwin SC; Lennon DT; Stanley CP; Sheridan GA; Walsh JC
Surgeon; 2021 Dec; 19(6):e507-e511. PubMed ID: 33451875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.
Aboalshamat K
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):797. PubMed ID: 37880640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Online Resources for Rotator Cuff Repair: What are Patients Reading?
Goldenberg BT; Schairer WW; Dekker TJ; Lacheta L; Millett PJ
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2019 Nov; 1(1):e85-e92. PubMed ID: 32266344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online Patient Education Resources for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Assessment of the Accuracy and Reliability of Information on the Internet Over the Past Decade.
Guzman AJ; Dela Rueda T; Williams N; Rayos Del Sol S; Jenkins S; Shin C; Bryant S; McGahan P; Chen Md Mph J
Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e46599. PubMed ID: 37937032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information.
Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
