BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35639163)

  • 1. Intracavitary brachytherapy with additional Heyman capsules in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Scharl S; Hugo C; Weidenbächer CB; Bronger H; Brambs C; Kiechle M; Makowski MR; Combs SE; Schüttrumpf L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Feb; 307(2):557-564. PubMed ID: 35639163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes and comparison of dosimetric parameters between intracavitary (Fletcher) and combined intracavitary/interstitial (Utrecht) brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Sarwar KA; Hussain S; Syed AS; Khan K; Maqsood T; Azeem T
    Brachytherapy; 2024; 23(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 37813708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRI-guided treatment-planning optimisation in intracavitary or combined intracavitary/interstitial PDR brachytherapy using tandem ovoid applicators in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Tersteeg RJ; Roesink JM; Bijmolt S; Nomden CN; Moerland MA; de Leeuw AA
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):322-30. PubMed ID: 19748695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proof of principle: Applicator-guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Assenholt MS; Vestergaard A; Kallehauge JF; Mohamed S; Nielsen SK; Petersen JB; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
    Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 24656732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical use of the Utrecht applicator for combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Nomden CN; de Leeuw AA; Moerland MA; Roesink JM; Tersteeg RJ; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(4):1424-30. PubMed ID: 21669505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early outcomes and impact of a hybrid IC/IS applicator for a new MRI-based cervical brachytherapy program.
    Harkenrider MM; Surucu M; Harmon G; Mysz ML; Shea SM; Yacoub J; Goldberg A; Liotta M; Winder A; Potkul R; Roeske JC; Small W
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(1):187-193. PubMed ID: 29089277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can combined intracavitary/interstitial approach be an alternative to interstitial brachytherapy with the Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT) in computed tomography-guided adaptive brachytherapy for bulky and/or irregularly shaped gynecological tumors?
    Oike T; Ohno T; Noda SE; Kiyohara H; Ando K; Shibuya K; Tamaki T; Takakusagi Y; Sato H; Nakano T
    Radiat Oncol; 2014 Oct; 9():222. PubMed ID: 25319341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 45 or 50 Gy, Which is the Optimal Radiotherapy Pelvic Dose in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Perspective of Reaching Magnetic Resonance Image-guided Adaptive Brachytherapy Planning Aims?
    Mazeron R; Petit C; Rivin E; Limkin E; Dumas I; Maroun P; Annede P; Martinetti F; Seisen T; Lefkopoulos D; Chargari C; Haie-Meder C
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Mar; 28(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 26547694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ring Versus Ovoids and Intracavitary Versus Intracavitary-Interstitial Applicators in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy: Results From the EMBRACE I Study.
    Serban M; Kirisits C; de Leeuw A; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Nesvacil N; Swamidas J; Hudej R; Lowe G; Hellebust TP; Menon G; Oinam A; Bownes P; Oosterveld B; De Brabandere M; Koedooder K; Langeland Marthinsen AB; Whitney D; Lindegaard J; Tanderup K;
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Apr; 106(5):1052-1062. PubMed ID: 32007365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Needle-free cervical cancer treatment using helical multishield intracavitary rotating shield brachytherapy with the
    Hopfensperger KM; Adams Q; Kim Y; Wu X; Xu W; Patwardhan K; Thammavong B; Caster J; Flynn RT
    Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2061-2071. PubMed ID: 32073669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dose planning study on applicator guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Assenholt MS; Petersen JB; Nielsen SK; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(7):1337-43. PubMed ID: 18663651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer using the novel hybrid applicator Venezia: Clinical feasibility and initial results.
    Walter F; Maihöfer C; Schüttrumpf L; Well J; Burges A; Ertl-Wagner B; Mahner S; Belka C; Gallwas J; Corradini S
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(5):775-781. PubMed ID: 29941345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of applying a single treatment plan for both fractions in PDR image guided brachytherapy in cervix cancer.
    Mohamed S; Nielsen SK; Fokdal LU; Pedersen EM; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
    Radiother Oncol; 2013 Apr; 107(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametrial boosting in locally advanced cervical cancer: combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy vs. intracavitary brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy.
    Mohamed S; Kallehauge J; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
    Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25455382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of dose-effect relationship between DVH parameters and clinical prognosis of definitive radio(chemo)therapy combined with intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A single-center retrospective study.
    Zhang N; Tang Y; Guo X; Mao Z; Yang W; Cheng G
    Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 31791712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multicentre treatment planning study of MRI-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: comparison between tandem-ovoid applicator users.
    Nomden CN; de Leeuw AA; Van Limbergen E; de Brabandere M; Nulens A; Nout RA; Laman M; Ketelaars M; Lutgens L; Reniers B; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM
    Radiother Oncol; 2013 Apr; 107(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 23127774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose-volume histogram analysis of composite EQD2 dose distributions using the central shielding technique in cervical cancer radiotherapy.
    Tamaki T; Noda SE; Ohno T; Kumazaki Y; Kato S; Nakano T
    Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 27475482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Local recurrences in cervical cancer patients in the setting of image-guided brachytherapy: a comparison of spatial dose distribution within a matched-pair analysis.
    Schmid MP; Kirisits C; Nesvacil N; Dimopoulos JC; Berger D; Pötter R
    Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):468-72. PubMed ID: 21924510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of dosimetric parameters in the treatment planning of magnetic resonance imaging-based intracavitary image-guided adaptive brachytherapy with and without optimization using the central shielding technique.
    Nishikawa R; Yoshida K; Ebina Y; Omoteda M; Miyawaki D; Ishihara T; Ejima Y; Akasaka H; Satoh H; Kyotani K; Takahashi S; Sasaki R
    J Radiat Res; 2018 May; 59(3):316-326. PubMed ID: 29518234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed Tomography-Guided Interstitial Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Introduction of the Technique and a Comparison of Dosimetry With Conventional Intracavitary Brachytherapy.
    Liu ZS; Guo J; Zhao YZ; Lin X; Zhang BY; Zhang C; Wang HY; Yu L; Ren XJ; Wang TJ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):768-775. PubMed ID: 28267131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.