These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35639294)

  • 21. Use of the instrumental inequalities in simulated mendelian randomization analyses with coarsened exposures.
    Diemer EW; Shi J; Hernan MA; Swanson SA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 May; 39(5):491-499. PubMed ID: 38819552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption.
    Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Zhao Q; Lawlor DA; Sheehan NA; Thompson J; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 48(3):728-742. PubMed ID: 30561657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantification of collider-stratification bias and the birthweight paradox.
    Whitcomb BW; Schisterman EF; Perkins NJ; Platt RW
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 23(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 19689488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of two-sample methods for Mendelian randomization analyses on single large datasets.
    Minelli C; Del Greco M F; van der Plaat DA; Bowden J; Sheehan NA; Thompson J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 50(5):1651-1659. PubMed ID: 33899104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combining Mendelian randomization with the sibling comparison design.
    Sjölander A; Frisell T; Öberg S; Wang Y; Hägg S
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):731-755. PubMed ID: 38073579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A novel Mendelian randomization method with binary risk factor and outcome.
    Allman PH; Aban I; Long DM; Bridges SL; Srinivasasainagendra V; MacKenzie T; Cutter G; Tiwari HK
    Genet Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 45(5):549-560. PubMed ID: 33998053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interpretation and Potential Biases of Mendelian Randomization Estimates With Time-Varying Exposures.
    Labrecque JA; Swanson SA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):231-238. PubMed ID: 30239571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multivariable Mendelian Randomization and Mediation.
    Sanderson E
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 32341063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genetic predisposition to smoking is associated with risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a Mendelian randomization study.
    Qian Y; Zhang L; Wu DJH; Xie Z; Wen C; Mao Y
    Arthritis Res Ther; 2020 Mar; 22(1):44. PubMed ID: 32143697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Approximation of bias and mean-squared error in two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses.
    Deng L; Zhang H; Song L; Yu K
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):369-379. PubMed ID: 31651042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption.
    Hartwig FP; Davey Smith G; Bowden J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1985-1998. PubMed ID: 29040600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies.
    Brion MJ; Shakhbazov K; Visscher PM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 42(5):1497-501. PubMed ID: 24159078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
    Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Overlapping-sample Mendelian randomisation with multiple exposures: a Bayesian approach.
    Zou L; Guo H; Berzuini C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Dec; 20(1):295. PubMed ID: 33287714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
    Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
    Liu W; Brookhart MA; Schneeweiss S; Mi X; Setoguchi S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 176(10):938-48. PubMed ID: 23100247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings.
    Sanderson E; Davey Smith G; Windmeijer F; Bowden J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 48(3):713-727. PubMed ID: 30535378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Causal association between serum total bilirubin and cholelithiasis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
    Sun Y; Yang S; Dai W; Zheng Z; Zhang X; Zheng Y; Wang J; Bi S; Duan Y; Wu S; Kong J
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1178486. PubMed ID: 37469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mendelian randomisation approaches to the study of prenatal exposures: A systematic review.
    Diemer EW; Labrecque JA; Neumann A; Tiemeier H; Swanson SA
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 35(1):130-142. PubMed ID: 32779786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.