201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35639310)
1. Informal economy and ecological footprint: the case of Africa.
Dada JT; Olaniyi CO; Ajide FM; Adeiza A; Arnaut M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(49):74756-74771. PubMed ID: 35639310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An empirical nexus between economic growth, energy utilization, trade policy, and ecological footprint: a continent-wise comparison in upper-middle-income countries.
Usman M; Kousar R; Yaseen MR; Makhdum MSA
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Nov; 27(31):38995-39018. PubMed ID: 32642896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Empirical analysis of the relationship among urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprint: evidence from Eastern Europe.
Addai K; Serener B; Kirikkaleli D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(19):27749-27760. PubMed ID: 34981376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urbanization, informal economy, and ecological footprint quality in South Asia.
Qayyum U; Sabir S; Anjum S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(47):67011-67021. PubMed ID: 34244937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries.
Kongbuamai N; Bui Q; Yousaf HMAU; Liu Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jun; 27(16):19251-19264. PubMed ID: 32253690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: evidence from OIC countries.
Ali S; Yusop Z; Kaliappan SR; Chin L
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Apr; 27(11):11671-11682. PubMed ID: 31970640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Financial development, globalization, and CO
Haseeb A; Xia E; Danish ; Baloch MA; Abbas K
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Nov; 25(31):31283-31296. PubMed ID: 30194575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of technological innovation and renewable energy on ecological footprint in G20 countries: The moderating role of institutional quality.
Raza A; Habib Y; Hashmi SH
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(42):95376-95393. PubMed ID: 37544946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does globalization mitigate environmental degradation in selected emerging economies? assessment of the role of financial development, economic growth, renewable energy consumption and urbanization.
Çetin M; Sarıgül SS; Topcu BA; Alvarado R; Karataser B
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(45):100340-100359. PubMed ID: 37651012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sustainable development of West African economies to achieve environmental quality.
Adjei M; Song H; Nketiah E; Obuobi B; Adu-Gyamfi G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):15253-15266. PubMed ID: 36168007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The determinants of environmental quality in the SAARC region: a spatial heterogeneous panel data approach.
Khalid K; Usman M; Mehdi MA
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(6):6422-6436. PubMed ID: 32997249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of trade openness on environmental pollution in EU-18 countries.
Tachie AK; Xingle L; Dauda L; Mensah CN; Appiah-Twum F; Adjei Mensah I
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(28):35535-35555. PubMed ID: 32594436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The shadow economy-environmental quality nexus in OECD countries: empirical evidence from panel quantile regression.
Chu LK; Hoang DP
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(43):65233-65258. PubMed ID: 35486281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital Economy and Environmental Sustainability: Do Information Communication and Technology (ICT) and Economic Complexity Matter?
Khan A; Ximei W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards achieving environmental sustainability: environmental quality versus economic growth in a developing economy on ecological footprint via dynamic simulations of ARDL.
Solarin SA; Nathaniel SP; Bekun FV; Okunola AM; Alhassan A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17942-17959. PubMed ID: 33410031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heading towards sustainable environment: exploring the dynamic linkage among selected macroeconomic variables and ecological footprint using a novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach.
Islam MS; Hossain ME; Khan MA; Rana MJ; Ema NS; Bekun FV
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(15):22260-22279. PubMed ID: 34782980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint linkage in CIVETS.
Nathaniel S; Nwodo O; Sharma G; Shah M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jun; 27(16):19616-19629. PubMed ID: 32219652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the asymmetric impact of physical infrastructure and trade openness on ecological footprint: An empirical evidence from Pakistan.
Zahra S; Khan D; Gupta R; Popp J; Oláh J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0262782. PubMed ID: 35580086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examination of the factors contributing to environmental degradation: does LPG consumption still matter?
Tekin B; Dirir SA
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(5):6815-6834. PubMed ID: 38153576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: do human capital and biocapacity matter?
Shujah-Ur-Rahman ; Chen S; Saud S; Saleem N; Bari MW
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(31):31856-31872. PubMed ID: 31489549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
