These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35640105)

  • 1. Biased Competition between Targets and Distractors Reduces Attentional Suppression: Evidence from the Positivity Posterior Contralateral and Distractor Positivity.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 34(9):1563-1575. PubMed ID: 35640105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Weinberger M; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(14):3180-3191. PubMed ID: 33653697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
    Kerzel D; Burra N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The attentional blink freezes spatial attention allocation to targets, not distractors: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pomerleau VJ; Fortier-Gauthier U; Corriveau I; McDonald JJ; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1559():33-45. PubMed ID: 24607298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Salient-but-irrelevant stimuli cause attentional capture in difficult, but attentional suppression in easy visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 28752665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Little engagement of attention by salient distractors defined in a different dimension or modality to the visual search target.
    Tsai SY; Nasemann J; Qiu N; Töllner T; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Dec; 60(12):e14375. PubMed ID: 37417320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence for the attention capture and suppression failure of irrelevant singleton in test anxiety.
    Hu C; Song J; Hong Y; Zhou R
    J Psychiatr Res; 2023 May; 161():386-392. PubMed ID: 37015159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional capture is modulated by stimulus saliency in visual search as evidenced by event-related potentials and alpha oscillations.
    Forschack N; Gundlach C; Hillyard S; Müller MM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):685-704. PubMed ID: 36525202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional selection and suppression in children and adults.
    Sun M; Wang E; Huang J; Zhao C; Guo J; Li D; Sun L; Du B; Ding Y; Song Y
    Dev Sci; 2018 Nov; 21(6):e12684. PubMed ID: 29761932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological Indices of Distractor Processing in Visual Search Are Shaped by Target Expectations.
    van Moorselaar D; Huang C; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 35(6):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 36951590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological correlates of attentional selection in tactile search tasks: The impact of singleton distractors on target selection.
    Mena CI; Lang K; Gherri E
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Sep; 57(9):e13592. PubMed ID: 32412112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of eccentricity on attentional capture.
    van Heusden E; Olivers CNL; Donk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):422-438. PubMed ID: 37258897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Top-down control of attention under varying task loads.
    Jo S; Kim JY; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 May; 216():103310. PubMed ID: 33892264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural mechanisms of surround attenuation and distractor competition in visual search.
    Boehler CN; Tsotsos JK; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 31(14):5213-24. PubMed ID: 21471356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.