These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35640105)

  • 21. Attentional processing of multiple targets and distractors.
    Munneke J; Fait E; Mazza V
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1104-8. PubMed ID: 23902254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electrophysiological evidence of multitasking impairment of attentional deployment reflects target-specific processing, not distractor inhibition.
    Corriveau I; Fortier-Gauthier U; Pomerleau VJ; McDonald J; Dell'acqua R; Jolicoeur P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Nov; 86(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 22732349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search.
    Lee J; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ; Geng JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1773-1787. PubMed ID: 30063176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.
    Chechlacz M; Hansen PC; Geng JJ; Cazzoli D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):851-866. PubMed ID: 29393718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control.
    Weaver MD; van Zoest W; Hickey C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():880-894. PubMed ID: 27836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs.
    Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 23747508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.
    Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An EEG study of the combined effects of top-down and bottom-up attentional selection under varying task difficulty.
    Rashal E; Senoussi M; Santandrea E; Ben-Hamed S; Macaluso E; Chelazzi L; Boehler CN
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Jun; 59(6):e14002. PubMed ID: 35060631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Salience detection and attentional capture.
    Schubö A
    Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 19066945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Global enhancement of target color-not proactive suppression-explains attentional deployment during visual search.
    Oxner M; Martinovic J; Forschack N; Lempe R; Gundlach C; Müller M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jun; 152(6):1705-1722. PubMed ID: 37023328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attentional selection: A salience-based competition for representation.
    Mounts JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1190-8. PubMed ID: 16502841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the electrophysiological evidence for the capture of visual attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ; Jannati A; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 23163789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.
    Noonan MP; Adamian N; Pike A; Printzlau F; Crittenden BM; Stokes MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(6):1797-807. PubMed ID: 26865606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Capture or suppression? Attentional allocation upon reward and loss-associated nonsalient distractors are supported by distinct neural mechanisms: An EEG study.
    Jiang Y; Cui C; Liu M; Zhang X
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jul; 157():107879. PubMed ID: 33957194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.