These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35641680)

  • 1. fullROC: An R package for generating and analyzing eyewitness-lineup ROC curves.
    Yang Y; Smith AM
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1259-1274. PubMed ID: 35641680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. sdtlu: An R package for the signal detection analysis of eyewitness lineup data.
    Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):278-300. PubMed ID: 32700238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distinguishing Between Investigator Discriminability and Eyewitness Discriminability: A Method for Creating Full Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves of Lineup Identification Performance.
    Smith AM; Yang Y; Wells GL
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 May; 15(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 32375014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
    Colloff MF; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reveal procedure: A way to enhance evidence of innocence from police lineups.
    Yilmaz AS; Lebensfeld TC; Wilson BM
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-173. PubMed ID: 35084905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.
    Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Cataldo AM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eyewitness Identification Is a Visual Search Task.
    Wixted JT; Vul E; Mickes L; Wilson BM
    Annu Rev Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 7():519-541. PubMed ID: 34270349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.
    Colloff MF; Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Wixted JT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Models of lineup memory.
    Wixted JT; Vul E; Mickes L; Wilson BM
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Sep; 105():81-114. PubMed ID: 30032063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects.
    Jones JM; Katzman J; Kovera MB
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1233782. PubMed ID: 38680285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.
    McKinley GL; Peterson DJ
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Oct; 7(1):95. PubMed ID: 36271974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using machine learning analyses to explore relations between eyewitness lineup looking behaviors and suspect guilt.
    Price HL; Bruer KC; Adkins MC
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):223-237. PubMed ID: 32105097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A validation of the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model by reanalyzing published data.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):13379. PubMed ID: 35927288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Apr; 121(2):262-76. PubMed ID: 24730600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.
    Mickes L; Flowe HD; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):361-76. PubMed ID: 23294282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental validation of a multinomial processing tree model for analyzing eyewitness identification decisions.
    Winter K; Menne NM; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15571. PubMed ID: 36114219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.