BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35641789)

  • 1. Proximal femoral replacement using the direct anterior approach to the hip.
    Thaler M; Manson TT; Holzapfel BM; Moskal J
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2022 Jun; 34(3):218-230. PubMed ID: 35641789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proximal femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.
    De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Nocon AA; Sculco TP; Sculco PK; Bostrom MP
    Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2227-2233. PubMed ID: 30415464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss: a review of outcomes.
    Viste A; Perry KI; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Mar; 99-B(3):325-329. PubMed ID: 28249971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The direct anterior approach to the hip revision].
    Nogler M; Mayr E; Krismer M
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2012 Apr; 24(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 22460625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Proximal and total femur replacement].
    Pennekamp PH; Wirtz DC; Dürr HR
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2012 Jul; 24(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 22743630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical results in early and mid term of using the S-ROM femoral stem in revision].
    Piao S; Zhou YG; Du YQ; Ma HY; Sun JY; Gao ZS; Peng YW; Wu WM
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Apr; 30(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 29349981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The Role of a Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in Lower Limb Endoprosthetic Revision Surgery - Outcome Analysis of 25 Patients].
    Schmolders J; Koob S; Schepers P; Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Burger C; Pennekamp PH; Strauss AC
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2017 Feb; 155(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 27632667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Becker V-shaped lateral rotation osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV development dislocation of hip].
    Li Y; Ma W; Sun J; Song X; An M; Zhang Q
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1032-6. PubMed ID: 24279008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-month follow-up].
    Boisgard S; Moreau PE; Tixier H; Levai JP
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 11319426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems.
    Fink B; Grossmann A
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distal Extension of the Anterior Approach to the Hip Using the Femoral Interbundle Technique: Surgical Technique and Case Series.
    Ghijselings SGM; Driesen R; Simon JP; Corten K
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jul; 32(7):2186-2190. PubMed ID: 28336251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total hip replacement through a minimally invasive, anterolateral approach with the patient supine.
    Roth A; Venbrocks RA
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Dec; 19(5-6):442-57. PubMed ID: 18071930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interlocking reconstruction-mode stem-sideplates preserve at-risk hips with short residual proximal femora.
    Christ AB; Fujiwara T; Yakoub MA; Healey JH
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Feb; 103-B(2):398-404. PubMed ID: 33517739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Total femur replacement in non-oncologic indications: Functional and radiological outcomes from a French survey with a mean 6 years' follow-up.
    Putman S; Migaud H; Saragaglia D; Jenny JY; Dujardin F; Hue AG; Fiorenza F; Méric O; Bonnevialle P;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Jun; 105(4):591-598. PubMed ID: 31027981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Direct Anterior Approach for Hip Revision: Accessing the Entire Femoral Diaphysis Without Endangering the Nerve Supply.
    Nogler MM; Thaler MR
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):510-514. PubMed ID: 27659396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Proximal tibial replacement and alloplastic reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after bone tumor resection].
    Holzapfel BM; Pilge H; Toepfer A; Jakubietz RG; Gollwitzer H; Rechl H; von Eisenhart-Rothe R; Rudert M
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2012 Jul; 24(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 22743634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The minimalinvasive direct anterior approach in aseptic cup revision hip arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up.
    Horsthemke MD; Koenig C; Gosheger G; Hardes J; Hoell S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2019 Jan; 139(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 30415415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur appropriate in the comorbid patient?
    Khajuria A; Ward J; Cooper G; Stevenson J; Parry M; Jeys L
    Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 29048688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total Femur Replacement After Tumor Resection: Limb Salvage Usually Achieved But Complications and Failures are Common.
    Sevelda F; Schuh R; Hofstaetter JG; Schinhan M; Windhager R; Funovics PT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2079-87. PubMed ID: 25832007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.