These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35642777)

  • 1. TocoDecoy: A New Approach to Design Unbiased Datasets for Training and Benchmarking Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
    Zhang X; Shen C; Liao B; Jiang D; Wang J; Wu Z; Du H; Wang T; Huo W; Xu L; Cao D; Hsieh CY; Hou T
    J Med Chem; 2022 Jun; 65(11):7918-7932. PubMed ID: 35642777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Topology-Based and Conformation-Based Decoys Database: An Unbiased Online Database for Training and Benchmarking Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
    Zhang X; Shen C; Wang T; Kang Y; Li D; Pan P; Wang J; Wang G; Deng Y; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T; Wang Z
    J Med Chem; 2023 Jul; 66(13):9174-9183. PubMed ID: 37317043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy or novelty: what can we gain from target-specific machine-learning-based scoring functions in virtual screening?
    Shen C; Weng G; Zhang X; Leung EL; Yao X; Pang J; Chai X; Li D; Wang E; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33418562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. LIT-PCBA: An Unbiased Data Set for Machine Learning and Virtual Screening.
    Tran-Nguyen VK; Jacquemard C; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4263-4273. PubMed ID: 32282202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ML-PLIC: a web platform for characterizing protein-ligand interactions and developing machine learning-based scoring functions.
    Zhang X; Shen C; Wang T; Deng Y; Kang Y; Li D; Hou T; Pan P
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 37738401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beware of the generic machine learning-based scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.
    Shen C; Hu Y; Wang Z; Zhang X; Pang J; Wang G; Zhong H; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32484221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MILCDock: Machine Learning Enhanced Consensus Docking for Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery.
    Morris CJ; Stern JA; Stark B; Christopherson M; Della Corte D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5342-5350. PubMed ID: 36342217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. TB-IECS: an accurate machine learning-based scoring function for virtual screening.
    Zhang X; Shen C; Jiang D; Zhang J; Ye Q; Xu L; Hou T; Pan P; Kang Y
    J Cheminform; 2023 Jul; 15(1):63. PubMed ID: 37403155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving structure-based virtual screening performance via learning from scoring function components.
    Xiong GL; Ye WL; Shen C; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32496540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SCORCH: Improving structure-based virtual screening with machine learning classifiers, data augmentation, and uncertainty estimation.
    McGibbon M; Money-Kyrle S; Blay V; Houston DR
    J Adv Res; 2023 Apr; 46():135-147. PubMed ID: 35901959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening.
    Chen L; Cruz A; Ramsey S; Dickson CJ; Duca JS; Hornak V; Koes DR; Kurtzman T
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220113. PubMed ID: 31430292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An unbiased method to build benchmarking sets for ligand-based virtual screening and its application to GPCRs.
    Xia J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L; Wang XS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1433-50. PubMed ID: 24749745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E): better ligands and decoys for better benchmarking.
    Mysinger MM; Carchia M; Irwin JJ; Shoichet BK
    J Med Chem; 2012 Jul; 55(14):6582-94. PubMed ID: 22716043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deep reinforcement learning enables better bias control in benchmark for virtual screening.
    Shen T; Li S; Wang XS; Wang D; Wu S; Xia J; Zhang L
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Mar; 171():108165. PubMed ID: 38402838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the Generalization Abilities of Machine-Learning Scoring Functions for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Zhu H; Yang J; Huang N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5485-5502. PubMed ID: 36268980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Machine-learning scoring functions trained on complexes dissimilar to the test set already outperform classical counterparts on a blind benchmark.
    Li H; Lu G; Sze KH; Su X; Chan WY; Leung KS
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34169324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benchmark of four popular virtual screening programs: construction of the active/decoy dataset remains a major determinant of measured performance.
    Chaput L; Martinez-Sanz J; Saettel N; Mouawad L
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():56. PubMed ID: 27803745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MF-PCBA: Multifidelity High-Throughput Screening Benchmarks for Drug Discovery and Machine Learning.
    Buterez D; Janet JP; Kiddle SJ; Liò P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(9):2667-2678. PubMed ID: 37058588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deffini: A family-specific deep neural network model for structure-based virtual screening.
    Zhou D; Liu F; Zheng Y; Hu L; Huang T; Huang YS
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Dec; 151(Pt B):106323. PubMed ID: 36436482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.