248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35645035)
1. N95 respirators: quantitative fit test pass rates and usability and comfort assessment by health care workers.
Ng I; Kave B; Begg F; Bodas CR; Segal R; Williams D
Med J Aust; 2022 Jul; 217(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 35645035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomised crossover trial of two flat-fold cup respirators: BYD DE2322 N95 versus Care Essentials MSK-002 P2.
Bodas CR; Ng I; Kave B; Begg F; Williams DL
Infect Dis Health; 2023 Feb; 28(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 36207250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized crossover study comparing quantitative fit tests between Trident™ and 3M™ Aura™ N95/P2 respirators.
Williams DL; Kave B; Begg F; Bodas C; Ng I
Infect Dis Health; 2022 May; 27(2):61-65. PubMed ID: 34799300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fit testing and comfort evaluation of prophylactic dressing use for healthcare workers under N95/P2 respirators in one health service district in Australia.
Barakat-Johnson M; Stephenson J; Dempsey K; Innes L; Jain S; Leong T; Schouten T; Coyer F; Hallahan A
J Hosp Infect; 2022 May; 123():100-107. PubMed ID: 35245647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact on quantitative fit-test results after application of prophylactic hydrocolloid dressing under N95 respirators.
Ng I; Kave B; Begg F; Sage S; Segal R; Williams DL
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 43(8):993-996. PubMed ID: 34269165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A study of environmental factors affecting nurses' comfort and protection in wearing N95 respirators during bedside procedures.
Or PP; Chung JW; Wong TK
J Clin Nurs; 2018 Apr; 27(7-8):e1477-e1484. PubMed ID: 29322580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Personalized 3D-printed frames to reduce leak from N95 filtering facepiece respirators: A prospective crossover trial in health care workers.
Chapman D; Strong C; Ullah S; Richards L; Ganesan AN
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2023 Jul; 20(7):304-314. PubMed ID: 37084394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of N95 respirators on fit rate, real-time leakage, and usability among Chinese healthcare workers: study protocol of a randomized crossover trial.
Lam SC; Odetayo A; Yu ITS; So SNY; Cheung K; Lee PH; Suen LKP
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1266607. PubMed ID: 38045983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review of passing fit testing of the masks and respirators used during the COVID-19 pandemic: Part 1-quantitative fit test procedures.
Fakherpour A; Jahangiri M; Jansz J
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0293129. PubMed ID: 37883443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.
Hon CY; Danyluk Q; Bryce E; Janssen B; Neudorf M; Yassi A; Shen H; Astrakianakis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Mar; 14(3):175-179. PubMed ID: 27717300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flat fold and cup-shaped N95 filtering facepiece respirator face seal area and pressure determinations: a stereophotogrammetry study.
Niezgoda G; Kim JH; Roberge RJ; Benson SM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(8):419-24. PubMed ID: 23767820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The adequacy of user seal checking for N95 respirators compared to formal fit testing: A multicentred observational study.
Cass HG; Hanlon GC; McKenzie DP; Harley NS; Kelly DN; Barrett JA
Aust Crit Care; 2023 Sep; 36(5):787-792. PubMed ID: 36244917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of N95 designs on respirator fit and its associations with gender and facial dimensions.
Khairul Hasni NA; Ismail R; Muhamad Robat R; Mohamad N; Suib FA; Pahrol MA; Mahmud H; Osman B; Lim YC; Seman Z; Shaharudin R
PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0288105. PubMed ID: 38019763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Under-mask beard covers achieve an adequate seal with tight-fitting disposable respirators using quantitative fit testing.
Bhatia DDS; Bhatia KS; Saluja T; Saluja APS; Thind A; Bamra A; Singh G; Singh N; Clezy K; Dempsey K; Hudson B; Jain S
J Hosp Infect; 2022 Oct; 128():8-12. PubMed ID: 35662553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reusing N95 Respirators at Weekly Intervals During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Nakamoto K; Saraya T; Kurai D; Fukukawa N; Taneoka T; Shimasaki T; Ishii H
Cureus; 2021 Feb; 13(2):e13542. PubMed ID: 33786247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fit evaluation of NIOSH approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators with various skin protectants: A pilot study.
Bergman MS; Grinshpun SA; Yermakov MV; Zhuang Z; Vollmer BE; Yoon KN
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2023 Sep; 20(9):365-372. PubMed ID: 37319423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of health worker acceptance and tolerance of respirators in clinical practice-An Australian perspective.
Jain S; Dempsey K; Clezy K; Bradd P
Am J Infect Control; 2024 Jan; 52(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 37454930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study on the relationship between the fitness of three types of N95 respirators and facial dimensions.
Wang G; Luo C; Cui C; Huang J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 May; 21(5):319-325. PubMed ID: 38416473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]