206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35645078)
1. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An
Sarda AS; Bedia SV
Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
Ghodsi S; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Rostami M; Alikhasi M
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of CAD-CAM milling versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang J; Li H
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 35788274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods.
Yildirim B
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings Fabricated with 3 Different Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
Yildirim B; Paken G
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 30667169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang J; Li H; Xu L; Wang Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 33789799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Marginal Fit of Cobalt-Chromium Metal-Ceramic Crowns Fabricated by CAD/CAM Techniques and Conventional Methods at Three Production Stages.
Real-Voltas F; Romano-Cardozo E; Figueras-Alvarez O; Brufau-de Barbera M; Cabratosa-Termes J
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(3):304–305. PubMed ID: 28319213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing.
Gunsoy S; Ulusoy M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 27538553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns.
Tamac E; Toksavul S; Toman M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol.
Dahl BE; Rønold HJ; Dahl JE
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):400-404. PubMed ID: 27692584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium copings fabricated using the conventional and the direct metal laser sintering techniques: A comparative
Ullattuthodi S; Cherian KP; Anandkumar R; Nambiar MS
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2017; 17(4):373-380. PubMed ID: 29249881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy evaluation of metal copings fabricated by computer-aided milling and direct metal laser sintering systems.
Park JK; Lee WS; Kim HY; Kim WC; Kim JH
J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Apr; 7(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 25932310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of different finish line preparations on the marginal and internal adaptation of cobalt-chromium metal alloy copings fabricated by using CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah N; Badwaik P; Sheth VH; Bhatnagar V; Bhanushali N; Patil P
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):716-728.e6. PubMed ID: 34716012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer.
Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Akhlaghian M; Pardis S; Mir N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 31672421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Evaluation of Retention and Vertical Marginal Accuracy of Co-Cr Copings Fabricated Using Three Different Techniques: An
Kalsekar BG; Gandhi PV; Patil R; Sabane AV; Kadam PP; Bhosale NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Oct; 23(10):991-997. PubMed ID: 37073911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
