199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35645078)
21. Evaluation of the Internal and Marginal Discrepancies of Co-Cr Metal Copings Prepared via CAD/CAM and Conventional Casting.
Dayan SC; Kiseri B; Gencel B; Kurt A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 30762994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Marginal Misfit of 3D-Printed (Selective Laser Sintered), CAD-CAM and Lost Wax Technique Cobalt Chromium Copings with Shoulder and Chamfer Finish Lines: An In-Vitro Study.
Al-Saleh S; Vohra F; Albogami SM; Alkhammash NM; Alnashwan MA; Almutairi NS; Aali KA; Alrabiah M; Abduljabbar T
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Sep; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 36295474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns in CAD/CAM and lost-wax techniques in all fabrication stages through replica weighting, triple scanning, and scanning electron microscope.
Sadr SM; Ahmadi E; Tabatabaei MH; Mohammadi S; Atri F
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Jun; 8(3):763-770. PubMed ID: 35187813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study.
Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28024815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps of metal ceramic crowns obtained from conventional impressions and casting techniques with those obtained from digital techniques.
Rai R; Kumar SA; Prabhu R; Govindan RT; Tanveer FM
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 28721994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single-crown fixed dental prostheses.
Dahl BE; Dahl JE; Rønold HJ
Eur J Oral Sci; 2018 Dec; 126(6):512-517. PubMed ID: 30298624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques.
Papadiochou S; Pissiotis AL
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):545-551. PubMed ID: 28967399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of repeated porcelain firings on the marginal fit of millable and conventional casting alloys.
Giti R; Hosseinpour Aghaei M; Mohammadi F
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0275374. PubMed ID: 37874843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of the marginal discrepancy of PFM crowns in the CAD/CAM and lost-wax fabrication techniques by triple scanning.
Ahmadi E; Tabatabaei MH; Sadr SM; Atri F
Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(4):417-422. PubMed ID: 33444489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Single Metal-Ceramic Crowns Fabricated with Casting, Milling, and Milling/Sintering Methods.
Moradpoor H; Samavati M; Raissi S; Emami M; Habibkhodaei M; Shirani M
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Nov; 36(5):581-587. PubMed ID: 36484670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses produced by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and the lost-wax metal casting technique assessed using the triple-scan protocol.
Dahl BE; Dahl JE; Rønold HJ
Eur J Oral Sci; 2018 Feb; 126(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 29171091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of Metal Copings Fabricated using Direct Metal Laser Sintering, Computer-Aided Milling, Ringless Casting, and Traditional Casting Techniques: An
James AE; Umamaheswari B; Shanthana Lakshmi CB
Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 30166838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Fit Between Zirconia and Metal Copings Fabricated Conventionally or Using Different CAD/CAM Techniques.
Keramari N; Hems EPT; Weisbloom M; Sambrook RJ; Petridis H
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Aug; 29(3):. PubMed ID: 33508181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations.
Tan PL; Gratton DG; Diaz-Arnold AM; Holmes DC
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 18355167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An evaluation of marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by direct metal laser sintering system.
Kim KB; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
Dent Mater; 2013 Jul; 29(7):e91-6. PubMed ID: 23680302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Production tolerance of conventional and digital workflow in the manufacturing of glass ceramic crowns.
Mahmood DJH; Braian M; Larsson C; Wennerberg A
Dent Mater; 2019 Mar; 35(3):486-494. PubMed ID: 30686710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
