These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35647506)

  • 1. Challenges to reasoning in forensic science decisions.
    Spellman BA; Eldridge H; Bieber P
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100200. PubMed ID: 35647506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health.
    Neal TMS; Lienert P; Denne E; Singh JP
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):99-120. PubMed ID: 35191729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.
    Cooper GS; Meterko V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():35-46. PubMed ID: 30769302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners.
    Edmond G; Towler A; Growns B; Ribeiro G; Found B; White D; Ballantyne K; Searston RA; Thompson MB; Tangen JM; Kemp RI; Martire K
    Sci Justice; 2017 Mar; 57(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28284440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breaking the barriers between intelligence, investigation and evaluation: A continuous approach to define the contribution and scope of forensic science.
    Baechler S; Morelato M; Gittelson S; Walsh S; Margot P; Roux C; Ribaux O
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Apr; 309():110213. PubMed ID: 32142993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias analysis in forensic and non-forensic psychiatric assessments.
    Escolà-Gascón Á; Dagnall N; Drinkwater K
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2023; 88():101891. PubMed ID: 37148618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Reasoning in Forensic Psychiatry: Concepts, Processes, and Pitfalls.
    Raharjanti NW; Wiguna T; Purwadianto A; Soemantri D; Bardosono S; Poerwandari EK; Mahajudin MS; Ramadianto AS; Alfonso CA; Findyartini A; Nugrahadi NR; Lazuardi MQ; Subroto PAM; Saroso OJDA; Levania MK
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():691377. PubMed ID: 34421677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A different perspective on the forensic science crisis.
    Weyermann C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 323():110779. PubMed ID: 33887571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II--judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):913-7. PubMed ID: 21729081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fostering medical students' clinical reasoning by learning from errors in clinical case vignettes: effects and conditions of additional prompting procedures to foster self-explanations.
    Klein M; Otto B; Fischer MR; Stark R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2019 May; 24(2):331-351. PubMed ID: 30627833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts.
    Shengelia T; Lagnado D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():519262. PubMed ID: 33613348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Causal Reasoning About Human Behavior Genetics: Synthesis and Future Directions.
    Lynch KE; Morandini JS; Dar-Nimrod I; Griffiths PE
    Behav Genet; 2019 Mar; 49(2):221-234. PubMed ID: 29922986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Causes of Errors in Clinical Reasoning: Cognitive Biases, Knowledge Deficits, and Dual Process Thinking.
    Norman GR; Monteiro SD; Sherbino J; Ilgen JS; Schmidt HG; Mamede S
    Acad Med; 2017 Jan; 92(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 27782919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.
    Curley LJ; Munro J; Lages M; MacLean R; Murray J
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):354-360. PubMed ID: 31693180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The logical foundations of forensic science: towards reliable knowledge.
    Evett I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience.
    Brainerd CJ; Reyna VF
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2001; 28():41-100. PubMed ID: 11605365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety.
    Royce CS; Hayes MM; Schwartzstein RM
    Acad Med; 2019 Feb; 94(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 30398993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical reasoning in dire times. Analysis of cognitive biases in clinical cases during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Coen M; Sader J; Junod-Perron N; Audétat MC; Nendaz M
    Intern Emerg Med; 2022 Jun; 17(4):979-988. PubMed ID: 34997906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive models of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Earnst KS; Marson DC; Harrell LE
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 Aug; 48(8):919-27. PubMed ID: 10968295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rethinking clinical decision-making to improve clinical reasoning.
    Corrao S; Argano C
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():900543. PubMed ID: 36160131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.