These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35649240)

  • 1. Effect of Time of Year on Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Renkosiak K; Bradley M; Dubinskaya A; Shepherd JP
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Sep; 28(9):561-566. PubMed ID: 35649240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-Term Costs of Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy Compared to Native Tissue Vaginal Repair With Concomitant Hysterectomy.
    El Haraki AS; Shepherd JP; Matthews CA; Cadish LA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 31(8):674-679. PubMed ID: 38705377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.
    Turner LC; Lavelle ES; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 26658893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally Invasive Sacrohysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.
    Hwang WY; Jeon MJ; Suh DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 May; 31(5):406-413. PubMed ID: 38336010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of prior prolapse repairs on surgical outcomes with minimally invasive sacral colpopexy.
    Dubinskaya A; Bradley MS; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2061-2067. PubMed ID: 32130464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anterior Wall Success at 1 Year After Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension and Sacral Colpopexy.
    Bastawros DA; Tarr ME; Templin MA; Stepp KJ; Taylor GB; Myers EM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Oct; 26(10):612-616. PubMed ID: 30394992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel transvaginal approach to correct recurrent apical prolapse after failed sacral colpopexy: case series.
    Bracken JN; Tran DH; Kuehl TJ; Larsen W; Yandell PM; Shull BL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1429-33. PubMed ID: 22527557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Yadav GS; Gaddam N; Rahn DD
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs. Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Case-Control Study.
    Campagna G; Vacca L; Panico G; Vizzielli G; Caramazza D; Zaccoletti R; Marturano M; Granese R; Arcieri M; Cianci S; Scambia G; Ercoli A
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():853694. PubMed ID: 35308533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy With Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study Through the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network.
    Noor N; Bastawros D; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Hobson D; Eto C; Lozo S; Lavelle E; Antosh D; Hacker MR; Elkadry E; Von Bargen E
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Oct; 28(10):687-694. PubMed ID: 35830589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension and sacral colpopexy: results and complications.
    Filmar GA; Fisher HW; Aranda E; Lotze PM
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1645-53. PubMed ID: 24819328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
    Hanes CR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ligament shortening compared to vaginal colpopexy at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Fairchild PS; Kamdar NS; Rosen ER; Swenson CW; Fenner DE; DeLancey JO; Morgan DM
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jun; 28(6):899-905. PubMed ID: 27858132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidence of adverse events after uterosacral colpopexy for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vault prolapse.
    Unger CA; Walters MD; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Paraiso MF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):603.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25434838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional surgery for uterosacral ligament suspension in patients who had concomitant vaginal hysterectomy for subtotal uterine prolapse.
    Ekin M; Dura MC; Yildiz S; Gürsoy B; Yildiz YY; Dogan K; Kaya C
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2024 Jul; 17(3):e13333. PubMed ID: 38839273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.