These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35649671)

  • 1. Biological and cellular responses of humans to high-level natural radiation: A clarion call for a fresh perspective on the linear no-threshold paradigm.
    Ghosh A
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2022 Jun; 878():503478. PubMed ID: 35649671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection.
    Laurier D; Billarand Y; Klokov D; Leuraud K
    J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jun; 43(2):. PubMed ID: 37339605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-evaluation of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model using new paradigms and modern molecular studies.
    Tharmalingam S; Sreetharan S; Brooks AL; Boreham DR
    Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():54-67. PubMed ID: 30763548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative proteomic analysis of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells indicates adaptive response to low-dose radiation in individuals from high background radiation areas of Kerala.
    Nishad S; Ghosh A
    Mutagenesis; 2018 Dec; 33(5-6):359-370. PubMed ID: 30496511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Progress in low dose health risk research: Novel effects and new concepts in low dose radiobiology.
    Averbeck D; Salomaa S; Bouffler S; Ottolenghi A; Smyth V; Sabatier L
    Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2018; 776():46-69. PubMed ID: 29807577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ionizing radiation protection and the linear No-threshold controversy: Extent of support or counter to the prevailing paradigm.
    Okonkwo UC; Ohagwu CC; Aronu ME; Okafor CE; Idumah CI; Okokpujie IP; Chukwu NN; Chukwunyelu CE
    J Environ Radioact; 2022 Nov; 253-254():106984. PubMed ID: 36057228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient repair of DNA double strand breaks in individuals from high level natural radiation areas of Kerala coast, south-west India.
    Jain V; Saini D; Kumar PRV; Jaikrishan G; Das B
    Mutat Res; 2017 Dec; 806():39-50. PubMed ID: 28963924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.
    Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
    C R Acad Sci III; 1999; 322(2-3):197-204. PubMed ID: 10196673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global transcriptome profile reveals abundance of DNA damage response and repair genes in individuals from high level natural radiation areas of Kerala coast.
    Jain V; Das B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187274. PubMed ID: 29161272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Response of Living Organisms to Low Radiation Environment and Its Implications in Radiation Protection.
    Belli M; Indovina L
    Front Public Health; 2020; 8():601711. PubMed ID: 33384980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uncertainties in estimating health risks associated with exposure to ionising radiation.
    Preston RJ; Boice JD; Brill AB; Chakraborty R; Conolly R; Hoffman FO; Hornung RW; Kocher DC; Land CE; Shore RE; Woloschak GE
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Sep; 33(3):573-88. PubMed ID: 23803503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
    Doss M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-linear dose response of DNA double strand breaks in response to chronic low dose radiation in individuals from high level natural radiation areas of Kerala coast.
    Jain V; Saini D; Soren DC; Kumar VA; Vivek Kumar PR; Koya PKM; Jaikrishan G; Das B
    Genes Environ; 2023 May; 45(1):16. PubMed ID: 37127760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy?
    Charles MW
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The LNT model for cancer induction is not supported by radiobiological data.
    Scott BR; Tharmalingam S
    Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():34-53. PubMed ID: 30763552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update.
    Boice JD
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 28532210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radar commentary: Use of linear no-threshold hypothesis in radiation protection regulation in the United States.
    Siegel JA; Stabin MG
    Health Phys; 2012 Jan; 102(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 22134084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
    Scott BR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation-induced versus endogenous DNA damage: possible effect of inducible protective responses in mitigating endogenous damage.
    Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2003 Jun; 22(6):290-306; discussion 307, 315-7, 319-23. PubMed ID: 12856953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation Biology and Its Role in the Canadian Radiation Protection Framework.
    Leblanc JE; Burtt JJ
    Health Phys; 2019 Sep; 117(3):319-329. PubMed ID: 30907783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.