These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35649953)

  • 1. Erratum: Recognizing individual concert halls is difficult when listening to the acoustics with different musical passages [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148, 1380-1390 (2020)].
    Kuusinen A; Lokki T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 May; 151(5):2897. PubMed ID: 35649953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognizing individual concert halls is difficult when listening to the acoustics with different musical passages.
    Kuusinen A; Lokki T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):1380. PubMed ID: 33003893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lateral reflections are favorable in concert halls due to binaural loudness.
    Lokki T; Pätynen J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL345-51. PubMed ID: 22088039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concert halls with strong and lateral sound increase the emotional impact of orchestra music.
    Pätynen J; Lokki T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1214-24. PubMed ID: 27036257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Erratum: A multiscale analytical model of bronchial airway acoustics [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 142, 1774-1783 (2017)].
    Henry B; Royston TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1427. PubMed ID: 29604716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Erratum: Acoustics of monodisperse open-cell foam: An experimental and numerical parametric study [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148, 1767-1778 (2020)].
    Langlois V; Kaddami A; Pitois O; Perrot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jan; 151(1):321. PubMed ID: 35105011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of loudness and envelopment for different orchestral dynamics.
    Lokki T; McLeod L; Kuusinen A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Oct; 148(4):2137. PubMed ID: 33138481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concert hall acoustics: Repertoire, listening position, and individual taste of the listeners influence the qualitative attributes and preferences.
    Lokki T; Pätynen J; Kuusinen A; Tervo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):551. PubMed ID: 27475177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The intensitive DL of tones: dependence of signal/masker ratio on tone level and on spectrum of added noise.
    Greenwood DD
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):1-39. PubMed ID: 8458743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relation of acoustical parameters with and without audiences in concert halls and a simple method for simulating the occupied state.
    Hidaka T; Nishihara N; Beranek LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1028-42. PubMed ID: 11303917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audience noise in concert halls during musical performances.
    Jeong CH; Marie P; Brunskog J; Møller Petersen C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2753-61. PubMed ID: 22501054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comment on "Acoustic chaos in a duct with two separate sound sources" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 120-126 (2001)].
    Castrejón-Pita AA; Castrejón-Pita JR; Huelsz G; Sarmiento-Galán A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):2702-5. PubMed ID: 19045755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response to "Comment on 'Resonant acoustic scattering by swimbladder-bearing fish'" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 571-580 (1978)].
    Love RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3399-402. PubMed ID: 24180749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comment on "A theoretical framework for quantitatively characterizing sound field diffusion based on scattering coefficient and absorption coefficient of walls" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 1140-1148 (2010)] (L).
    Omoto A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 23297877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of the just noticeable difference of early decay time for symphonic halls.
    Del Solar Dorrego F; Vigeant MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jan; 151(1):80. PubMed ID: 35105034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Erratum: A simplified model for thin acoustic screens [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 144(1), EL76-EL81 (2018)].
    Gaborit M; Dazel O; Göransson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):1382. PubMed ID: 31472581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Macaque thresholds for detecting increases in intensity: effects of formant structure.
    Le Prell CG; Niemiec AJ; Moody DB
    Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 162(1-2):29-42. PubMed ID: 11707349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comment on "On Dowell's simplification for acoustic cavity-structure interaction and consistent alternatives" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 22-32 (2010)].
    Dowell EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):1-2; discussion 3-4. PubMed ID: 20649193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comment on "The directionality of acoustic T-phase signals from small magnitude submarine earthquakes" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 3669-3675 (2006)].
    Bohnenstiehl DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1293-6; discussion 1297-8. PubMed ID: 17407863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Erratum: Perception of loudness and envelopment for different orchestral dynamics [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 148, 2137-2145 (2020)].
    Lokki T; McLeod L; Kuusinen A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 May; 151(5):2843. PubMed ID: 35649948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.