These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35650382)

  • 1. Same same, but different: A psychometric examination of three frequently used experimental tasks for cognitive bias assessment in a sample of healthy young adults.
    Machulska A; Kleinke K; Klucken T
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1332-1351. PubMed ID: 35650382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of and associations between cognitive bias measures and response inhibition in smoking.
    Wittekind CE; Schiebel T; Kühn S
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2023 Dec; 81():101853. PubMed ID: 36947971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A psychometric comparison of anxiety-relevant attention measures.
    Evans TC; Walukevich KA; Seager I; Britton JC
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2018 Sep; 31(5):539-554. PubMed ID: 29976098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The psychometric properties of the dot-probe paradigm when used in pain-related attentional bias research.
    Dear BF; Sharpe L; Nicholas MK; Refshauge K
    J Pain; 2011 Dec; 12(12):1247-54. PubMed ID: 21982721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychometric Evaluation of Social Cognitive Measures for Adults with Autism.
    Morrison KE; Pinkham AE; Kelsven S; Ludwig K; Penn DL; Sasson NJ
    Autism Res; 2019 May; 12(5):766-778. PubMed ID: 30770676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and convergence of approach/avoidance bias assessment tasks in the food consumption domain.
    Basanovic J; Dondzilo L; Rudaizky D; Van Bockstaele B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 May; 76(5):968-978. PubMed ID: 35658700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Suicide Dot Probe Task: Psychometric properties and validity in relation to suicide-related outcomes.
    Rogers ML; Carosa CL; Haliczer LA; Hughes CD; Schofield CA; Armey MF
    Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2023 Dec; 53(6):1010-1024. PubMed ID: 37702551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometric properties of reaction time based experimental paradigms measuring anxiety-related information-processing biases in children.
    Brown HM; Eley TC; Broeren S; Macleod C; Rinck M; Hadwin JA; Lester KJ
    J Anxiety Disord; 2014 Jan; 28(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 24486916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the psychometric properties of dot-probe attention measures using response-based computation.
    Evans TC; Britton JC
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2018 Sep; 60():95-103. PubMed ID: 29580549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research.
    Price RB; Kuckertz JM; Siegle GJ; Ladouceur CD; Silk JS; Ryan ND; Dahl RE; Amir N
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):365-76. PubMed ID: 25419646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Touchscreen-based assessment of food approach biases: Investigating reliability and item-specific preferences.
    Kahveci S; van Alebeek H; Berking M; Blechert J
    Appetite; 2021 Aug; 163():105190. PubMed ID: 33711352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failed attempts to improve the reliability of the alcohol visual probe task following empirical recommendations.
    Jones A; Christiansen P; Field M
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2018 Dec; 32(8):922-932. PubMed ID: 30475013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two probes and better than one: Development of a psychometrically reliable variant of the attentional probe task.
    Grafton B; Teng S; MacLeod C
    Behav Res Ther; 2021 Mar; 138():103805. PubMed ID: 33485106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias.
    Ataya AF; Adams S; Mullings E; Cooper RM; Attwood AS; Munafò MR
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2012 Feb; 121(1-2):148-51. PubMed ID: 21955365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability (or lack thereof) of smartphone ecological momentary assessment of visual dot probe attention bias toward threat indices.
    Zainal NH; Jacobson NC
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2024 Mar; 82():101918. PubMed ID: 37907019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychometric assessment of social cognitive tasks.
    Gourlay C; Collin P; Caron PO; D'Auteuil C; Scherzer PB
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2022; 29(4):731-749. PubMed ID: 32841055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and validity of measures of attentional bias towards threat in unselected student samples: seek, but will you find?
    Van Bockstaele B; Lamens L; Salemink E; Wiers RW; Bögels SM; Nikolaou K
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Mar; 34(2):217-228. PubMed ID: 31044648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeated measurement of implicit self-associations in clinical depression: Psychometric, neural, and computational properties.
    Price RB; Panny B; Degutis M; Griffo A
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2021 Feb; 130(2):152-165. PubMed ID: 33271040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability measures in the dot-probe task among people with social anxiety disorder.
    Molloy A; Anderson PL
    Psychol Assess; 2020 Sep; 32(9):883-888. PubMed ID: 32525343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety.
    Kappenman ES; Farrens JL; Luck SJ; Proudfit GH
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1368. PubMed ID: 25538644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.