These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35650555)

  • 1. A two-center pilot study on the effects of clinical ethics support on coercive measures in psychiatry.
    Stoll J; Westermair AL; Kübler U; Reisch T; Cattapan K; Bridler R; Maier R; Trachsel M
    BMC Psychiatry; 2022 Jun; 22(1):370. PubMed ID: 35650555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coercion in psychiatry: A cross-sectional study on staff views and emotions.
    Krieger E; Moritz S; Lincoln TM; Fischer R; Nagel M
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2021 Apr; 28(2):149-162. PubMed ID: 32348607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two years of ethics reflection groups about coercion in psychiatry. Measuring variation within employees' normative attitudes, user involvement and the handling of disagreement.
    Molewijk B; Pedersen R; Kok A; Førde R; Aasland O
    BMC Med Ethics; 2023 May; 24(1):29. PubMed ID: 37173770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients' attitudes towards and acceptance of coercion in psychiatry.
    Krieger E; Moritz S; Weil R; Nagel M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Feb; 260():478-485. PubMed ID: 29287276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry.
    Flammer E; Frank U; Steinert T
    Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():146. PubMed ID: 32194460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical course and prevalence of coercive measures: an observational study among involuntarily hospitalised psychiatric patients.
    Hotzy F; Moetteli S; Theodoridou A; Schneeberger AR; Seifritz E; Hoff P; Jäger M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2018; 148():w14616. PubMed ID: 29698543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Moral case deliberation about coercion in psychiatry. Dilemmas, value and implementation].
    Voskes Y; Evenblij K; Noorthoorn E; Porz R; Widdershoven G
    Psychiatr Prax; 2014 Oct; 41(7):364-70. PubMed ID: 25295977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: A Review of Ethical Arguments.
    Chieze M; Clavien C; Kaiser S; Hurst S
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():790886. PubMed ID: 34970171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Ethics in Reducing and Improving the Quality of Coercion in Mental Health Care.
    Norvoll R; Hem MH; Pedersen R
    HEC Forum; 2017 Mar; 29(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 27743277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stricter legislation on coercive measures in child and adolescent psychiatric care: a qualitative interview study with staff.
    Moell A; Rozental A; Buchmayer S; Kaltiala R; Långström N
    BMC Psychiatry; 2024 Feb; 24(1):102. PubMed ID: 38317134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Treat me with respect". A systematic review and thematic analysis of psychiatric patients' reported perceptions of the situations associated with the process of coercion.
    Tingleff EB; Bradley SK; Gildberg FA; Munksgaard G; Hounsgaard L
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2017 Nov; 24(9-10):681-698. PubMed ID: 28665512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.
    Chieze M; Hurst S; Kaiser S; Sentissi O
    Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():491. PubMed ID: 31404294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [What replaces the locked door? : Conceptual and ethical considerations regarding open door policies, formal coercion and treatment pressures].
    Gather J; Scholten M; Henking T; Vollmann J; Juckel G
    Nervenarzt; 2019 Jul; 90(7):690-694. PubMed ID: 31073672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Humane treatment versus means of control: coercive measures in Norwegian high-security psychiatry, 1895-1978.
    Rabben MB; Thomassen Ø
    Hist Psychiatry; 2019 Dec; 30(4):424-442. PubMed ID: 31390904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of moral case deliberation at the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate: a pilot study.
    Seekles W; Widdershoven G; Robben P; van Dalfsen G; Molewijk B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 May; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27209161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. General and Case-Specific Approval of Coercion in Psychiatry in the Public Opinion.
    Steiger S; Moeller J; Sowislo JF; Lieb R; Lang UE; Huber CG
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.
    Janssen WA; van de Sande R; Noorthoorn EO; Nijman HL; Bowers L; Mulder CL; Smit A; Widdershoven GA; Steinert T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 22079087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing coercion in mental healthcare.
    Sashidharan SP; Mezzina R; Puras D
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2019 Dec; 28(6):605-612. PubMed ID: 31284895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting coercion during the course of psychiatric hospitalizations.
    Müller M; Brackmann N; Jäger M; Theodoridou A; Vetter S; Seifritz E; Hotzy F
    Eur Psychiatry; 2023 Jan; 66(1):e22. PubMed ID: 36700423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of nursing staff attitudes and characteristics on the use of coercive measures in acute mental health services-A systematic review.
    Doedens P; Vermeulen J; Boyette LL; Latour C; de Haan L
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2020 Aug; 27(4):446-459. PubMed ID: 31876970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.