121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35651749)
1. Influence of DNA extraction kits on freshwater fungal DNA metabarcoding.
Matsuoka S; Sugiyama Y; Nagano M; Doi H
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13477. PubMed ID: 35651749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing waterborne eDNA capture from waterholes in savanna systems under remote field conditions.
Schenekar T; Baxter J; Phukuntsi MA; Sedlmayr I; Weckworth B; Mwale M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13942. PubMed ID: 38390664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish in Malaysian tropical rivers using short-read nanopore sequencing as a potential biomonitoring tool.
Munian K; Ramli FF; Othman N; Mahyudin NAA; Sariyati NH; Abdullah-Fauzi NAF; Haris H; Ilham-Norhakim ML; Abdul-Latiff MAB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13936. PubMed ID: 38419264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing sediment DNA extraction methods for assessing organic enrichment associated with marine aquaculture.
Pearman JK; Keeley NB; Wood SA; Laroche O; Zaiko A; Thomson-Laing G; Biessy L; Atalah J; Pochon X
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10231. PubMed ID: 33194417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lurking in the water: testing eDNA metabarcoding as a tool for ecosystem-wide parasite detection.
Thomas LJ; Milotic M; Vaux F; Poulin R
Parasitology; 2022 Feb; 149(2):261-269. PubMed ID: 34709144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Airborne environmental DNA captures terrestrial vertebrate diversity in nature.
Lynggaard C; Frøslev TG; Johnson MS; Olsen MT; Bohmann K
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13840. PubMed ID: 37497670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soil filtration-sedimentation improves shelled protist recovery in eukaryotic eDNA surveys.
Lentendu G; Bruni EP; Ah-Peng C; Fujinuma J; Kubota Y; Lorite J; Peñas J; Huang S; Strasberg D; Vittoz P; Mitchell EAD
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Aug; 23(6):1361-1371. PubMed ID: 37157180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An integrated spatio-temporal view of riverine biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Perry WB; Seymour M; Orsini L; Jâms IB; Milner N; Edwards F; Harvey R; de Bruyn M; Bista I; Walsh K; Emmett B; Blackman R; Altermatt F; Lawson Handley L; Mächler E; Deiner K; Bik HM; Carvalho G; Colbourne J; Cosby BJ; Durance I; Creer S
Nat Commun; 2024 May; 15(1):4372. PubMed ID: 38782932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mock community experiments can inform on the reliability of eDNA metabarcoding data: a case study on marine phytoplankton.
Marinchel N; Marchesini A; Nardi D; Girardi M; Casabianca S; Vernesi C; Penna A
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20164. PubMed ID: 37978238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancing amphibian biomonitoring through eDNA metabarcoding.
Mu Y; Zhang J; Yang J; Wu J; Zhang Y; Yu H; Zhang X
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13931. PubMed ID: 38345249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species.
Shu L; Ludwig A; Peng Z
Genes (Basel); 2020 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 32168762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding assays to detect invasive invertebrate species in the Great Lakes.
Klymus KE; Marshall NT; Stepien CA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177643. PubMed ID: 28542313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrating citizen science and environmental DNA metabarcoding to study biodiversity of groundwater amphipods in Switzerland.
Couton M; Studer A; Hürlemann S; Locher N; Knüsel M; Alther R; Altermatt F
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18097. PubMed ID: 37872363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revisiting the effect of PCR replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Shirazi S; Meyer RS; Shapiro B
Ecol Evol; 2021 Nov; 11(22):15766-15779. PubMed ID: 34824788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Have the cake and eat it: Optimizing nondestructive DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrate samples for freshwater biomonitoring.
Martins FMS; Galhardo M; Filipe AF; Teixeira A; Pinheiro P; Paupério J; Alves PC; Beja P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jul; 19(4):863-876. PubMed ID: 30901128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Annual time-series analysis of aqueous eDNA reveals ecologically relevant dynamics of lake ecosystem biodiversity.
Bista I; Carvalho GR; Walsh K; Seymour M; Hajibabaei M; Lallias D; Christmas M; Creer S
Nat Commun; 2017 Jan; 8():14087. PubMed ID: 28098255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why eDNA fractions need consideration in biomonitoring.
Nagler M; Podmirseg SM; Ascher-Jenull J; Sint D; Traugott M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2458-2470. PubMed ID: 35652762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of eDNA for monitoring riverine macroinvertebrates.
Poyntz-Wright IP; Harrison XA; Pedersen S; Tyler CR
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Sep; 941():173621. PubMed ID: 38815833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for marine mollusks and comparison with published primers.
Shi X; Jiang Y; Cao L; Zeng C
BMC Ecol Evol; 2024 May; 24(1):73. PubMed ID: 38822255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
