260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35651749)
21. Assessment of fungal diversity present in lakes of Maritime Antarctica using DNA metabarcoding: a temporal microcosm experiment.
de Souza LMD; Ogaki MB; Câmara PEAS; Pinto OHB; Convey P; Carvalho-Silva M; Rosa CA; Rosa LH
Extremophiles; 2021 Jan; 25(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 33416982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding shows high potential as a novel approach to quantitatively assess fish community.
Tsuji S; Inui R; Nakao R; Miyazono S; Saito M; Kono T; Akamatsu Y
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21524. PubMed ID: 36513686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Decision-making and best practices for taxonomy-free environmental DNA metabarcoding in biomonitoring using Hill numbers.
Mächler E; Walser JC; Altermatt F
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3326-3339. PubMed ID: 33188644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Plant DNA metabarcoding of lake sediments: How does it represent the contemporary vegetation.
Alsos IG; Lammers Y; Yoccoz NG; Jørgensen T; Sjögren P; Gielly L; Edwards ME
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195403. PubMed ID: 29664954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Catchment-based sampling of river eDNA integrates terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity of alpine landscapes.
Reji Chacko M; Altermatt F; Fopp F; Guisan A; Keggin T; Lyet A; Rey PL; Richards E; Valentini A; Waldock C; Pellissier L
Oecologia; 2023 Aug; 202(4):699-713. PubMed ID: 37558733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Modeling the ecological status response of rivers to multiple stressors using machine learning: A comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and morphological data.
Fan J; Wang S; Li H; Yan Z; Zhang Y; Zheng X; Wang P
Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116004. PubMed ID: 32622231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Unlocking biodiversity and conservation studies in high-diversity environments using environmental DNA (eDNA): A test with Guianese freshwater fishes.
Cilleros K; Valentini A; Allard L; Dejean T; Etienne R; Grenouillet G; Iribar A; Taberlet P; Vigouroux R; Brosse S
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 29768738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Environmental nucleic acids: A field-based comparison for monitoring freshwater habitats using eDNA and eRNA.
Littlefair JE; Rennie MD; Cristescu ME
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Nov; 22(8):2928-2940. PubMed ID: 35730338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Environmental DNA of insects and springtails from caves reveals complex processes of eDNA transfer in soils.
Lunghi E; Valle B; Guerrieri A; Bonin A; Cianferoni F; Manenti R; Ficetola GF
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 826():154022. PubMed ID: 35202680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lurking in the water: testing eDNA metabarcoding as a tool for ecosystem-wide parasite detection.
Thomas LJ; Milotic M; Vaux F; Poulin R
Parasitology; 2022 Feb; 149(2):261-269. PubMed ID: 34709144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages.
Shen M; Xiao N; Zhao Z; Guo N; Luo Z; Sun G; Li J
Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):11113. PubMed ID: 35773335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Valentini A; Taberlet P; Miaud C; Civade R; Herder J; Thomsen PF; Bellemain E; Besnard A; Coissac E; Boyer F; Gaboriaud C; Jean P; Poulet N; Roset N; Copp GH; Geniez P; Pont D; Argillier C; Baudoin JM; Peroux T; Crivelli AJ; Olivier A; Acqueberge M; Le Brun M; Møller PR; Willerslev E; Dejean T
Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(4):929-42. PubMed ID: 26479867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Illumina iSeq 100 and MiSeq exhibit similar performance in freshwater fish environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Nakao R; Inui R; Akamatsu Y; Goto M; Doi H; Matsuoka S
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):15763. PubMed ID: 34344957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accumulation curves of environmental DNA sequences predict coastal fish diversity in the coral triangle.
Juhel JB; Utama RS; Marques V; Vimono IB; Sugeha HY; Kadarusman ; Pouyaud L; Dejean T; Mouillot D; Hocdé R
Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jul; 287(1930):20200248. PubMed ID: 32635874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Airborne environmental DNA captures terrestrial vertebrate diversity in nature.
Lynggaard C; Frøslev TG; Johnson MS; Olsen MT; Bohmann K
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13840. PubMed ID: 37497670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Soil filtration-sedimentation improves shelled protist recovery in eukaryotic eDNA surveys.
Lentendu G; Bruni EP; Ah-Peng C; Fujinuma J; Kubota Y; Lorite J; Peñas J; Huang S; Strasberg D; Vittoz P; Mitchell EAD
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Aug; 23(6):1361-1371. PubMed ID: 37157180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spider webs as eDNA samplers: Biodiversity assessment across the tree of life.
Gregorič M; Kutnjak D; Bačnik K; Gostinčar C; Pecman A; Ravnikar M; Kuntner M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2534-2545. PubMed ID: 35510791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Meta-analysis shows both congruence and complementarity of DNA and eDNA metabarcoding to traditional methods for biological community assessment.
Keck F; Blackman RC; Bossart R; Brantschen J; Couton M; Hürlemann S; Kirschner D; Locher N; Zhang H; Altermatt F
Mol Ecol; 2022 Mar; 31(6):1820-1835. PubMed ID: 35075700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. eDNA metabarcoding revealed differential structures of aquatic communities in a dynamic freshwater ecosystem shaped by habitat heterogeneity.
Xie R; Zhao G; Yang J; Wang Z; Xu Y; Zhang X; Wang Z
Environ Res; 2021 Oct; 201():111602. PubMed ID: 34214559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
