BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35652348)

  • 1. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version 1 in Acute Cervical Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Balbinot G; Wang JZ; Abel R; Bolliger M; Curt A; Fehlings MG; Jin D; Verrier M; Velstra IM
    J Neurotrauma; 2022 Dec; 39(23-24):1645-1653. PubMed ID: 35652348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in Strength, Sensation, and Prehension in Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: European Multicenter Responsiveness Study of the GRASSP.
    Velstra IM; Curt A; Frotzler A; Abel R; Kalsi-Ryan S; Rietman JS; Bolliger M
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2015 Sep; 29(8):755-66. PubMed ID: 25567122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Curt A; Verrier MC; Fehlings MG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(1 Suppl):65-76. PubMed ID: 22985372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) and the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP).
    Marino RJ; Sinko R; Bryden A; Backus D; Chen D; Nemunaitis GA; Leiby BE
    Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil; 2018; 24(3):227-238. PubMed ID: 29997426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction and stratification of upper limb function and self-care in acute cervical spinal cord injury with the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and prehension (GRASSP).
    Velstra IM; Bolliger M; Tanadini LG; Baumberger M; Abel R; Rietman JS; Curt A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 Sep; 28(7):632-42. PubMed ID: 24566986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsiveness, Sensitivity, and Minimally Detectable Difference of the Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension, Version 1.0.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Beaton D; Ahn H; Askes H; Drew B; Curt A; Popovic MR; Wang J; Verrier MC; Fehlings MG
    J Neurotrauma; 2016 Feb; 33(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 26560017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Beaton D; Curt A; Duff S; Popovic MR; Rudhe C; Fehlings MG; Verrier MC
    J Neurotrauma; 2012 Mar; 29(5):905-14. PubMed ID: 21568688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome of the upper limb in cervical spinal cord injury: Profiles of recovery and insights for clinical studies.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Beaton D; Curt A; Popovic MR; Verrier MC; Fehlings MG
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2014 Sep; 37(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 25229734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting task performance from upper extremity impairment measures after cervical spinal cord injury.
    Zariffa J; Curt A; Verrier MC; Fehlings MG; Kalsi-Ryan S;
    Spinal Cord; 2016 Dec; 54(12):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 27241449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The graded redefined assessment of strength sensibility and prehension version 2 (GV2): Psychometric properties.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Chan C; Verrier M; Curt A; Fehlings M; Bolliger M; Velstra IM; ;
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2019 Oct; 42(sup1):149-157. PubMed ID: 31573454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in sensorimotor and functional recovery between the dominant and non-dominant upper extremity following cervical spinal cord injury.
    Bondi M; Kalsi-Ryan S; Delparte JJ; Burns AS
    Spinal Cord; 2022 May; 60(5):422-427. PubMed ID: 35273373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version 2 Provides Interval Measure Properties.
    Velstra IM; Fellinghauer C; Abel R; Kalsi-Ryan S; Rupp R; Curt A
    J Neurotrauma; 2018 Mar; 35(6):854-863. PubMed ID: 29160145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive Value of Upper Limb Muscles and Grasp Patterns on Functional Outcome in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
    Velstra IM; Bolliger M; Krebs J; Rietman JS; Curt A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2016 May; 30(4):295-306. PubMed ID: 26156192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a Remote Version of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation, and Prehension (GRASSP): Validity and Reliability.
    Voss S; Adighibe A; Sanders E; Aaby D; Kravitt R; Clark G; Breen K; Barry A; Forrest GF; Kirshblum SC; Perez MA; Kalsi-Ryan S; Kocherginsky M; Rymer WZ; Sandhu MS
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2023; 37(2-3):83-93. PubMed ID: 36987396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defining the role of sensation, strength, and prehension for upper limb function in cervical spinal cord injury.
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Beaton D; Curt A; Duff S; Jiang D; Popovic MR; Rudhe C; Fehlings MG; Verrier MC
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 Jan; 28(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 23778700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of Upper Limb Impairment Related to Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Development of a Sensitive Hand Assessment (Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension Version Myelopathy).
    Kalsi-Ryan S; Riehm LE; Tetreault L; Martin AR; Teoderascu F; Massicotte E; Curt A; Verrier MC; Velstra IM; Fehlings MG
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Mar; 86(3):E292-E299. PubMed ID: 31792501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grasp Analysis in the Home Environment as a Measure of Hand Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
    Dousty M; Bandini A; Eftekhar P; Fleet DJ; Zariffa J
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2023 Jul; 37(7):466-474. PubMed ID: 37272451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and prehension (GRASSP) in children with tetraplegia.
    Mulcahey MJ; Calhoun Thielen C; Dent K; Sinko R; Sadowsky C; Martin R; Vogel LC; Davidson L; Taylor H; Bultman J; Gaughan J
    Spinal Cord; 2018 Aug; 56(8):741-749. PubMed ID: 29626193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcutaneous Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined with Robotic Exoskeleton Rehabilitation for the Upper Limbs in Subjects with Cervical SCI: Clinical Trial.
    García-Alén L; Kumru H; Castillo-Escario Y; Benito-Penalva J; Medina-Casanovas J; Gerasimenko YP; Edgerton VR; García-Alías G; Vidal J
    Biomedicines; 2023 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 36831125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Combined Upper Limb Robotic Therapy in Patients With Tetraplegic Spinal Cord Injury.
    Jung JH; Lee HJ; Cho DY; Lim JE; Lee BS; Kwon SH; Kim HY; Lee SJ
    Ann Rehabil Med; 2019 Aug; 43(4):445-457. PubMed ID: 31499598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.