213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35652762)
1. Why eDNA fractions need consideration in biomonitoring.
Nagler M; Podmirseg SM; Ascher-Jenull J; Sint D; Traugott M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2458-2470. PubMed ID: 35652762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods.
Pawlowski J; Bruce K; Panksep K; Aguirre FI; Amalfitano S; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Baussant T; Bouchez A; Carugati L; Cermakova K; Cordier T; Corinaldesi C; Costa FO; Danovaro R; Dell'Anno A; Duarte S; Eisendle U; Ferrari BJD; Frontalini F; Frühe L; Haegerbaeumer A; Kisand V; Krolicka A; Lanzén A; Leese F; Lejzerowicz F; Lyautey E; Maček I; Sagova-Marečková M; Pearman JK; Pochon X; Stoeck T; Vivien R; Weigand A; Fazi S
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151783. PubMed ID: 34801504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental DNA of insects and springtails from caves reveals complex processes of eDNA transfer in soils.
Lunghi E; Valle B; Guerrieri A; Bonin A; Cianferoni F; Manenti R; Ficetola GF
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 826():154022. PubMed ID: 35202680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental DNA: What's behind the term? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring.
Pawlowski J; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Altermatt F
Mol Ecol; 2020 Nov; 29(22):4258-4264. PubMed ID: 32966665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aquatic environmental DNA: A review of the macro-organismal biomonitoring revolution.
Takahashi M; Saccò M; Kestel JH; Nester G; Campbell MA; van der Heyde M; Heydenrych MJ; Juszkiewicz DJ; Nevill P; Dawkins KL; Bessey C; Fernandes K; Miller H; Power M; Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M; Newton JP; White NE; Richards ZT; Allentoft ME
Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 873():162322. PubMed ID: 36801404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish in Malaysian tropical rivers using short-read nanopore sequencing as a potential biomonitoring tool.
Munian K; Ramli FF; Othman N; Mahyudin NAA; Sariyati NH; Abdullah-Fauzi NAF; Haris H; Ilham-Norhakim ML; Abdul-Latiff MAB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13936. PubMed ID: 38419264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancing amphibian biomonitoring through eDNA metabarcoding.
Mu Y; Zhang J; Yang J; Wu J; Zhang Y; Yu H; Zhang X
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13931. PubMed ID: 38345249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A combination of machine-learning and eDNA reveals the genetic signature of environmental change at the landscape levels.
Keck F; Brantschen J; Altermatt F
Mol Ecol; 2023 Sep; 32(17):4791-4800. PubMed ID: 37436405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.
Gold Z; Wall AR; Schweizer TM; Pentcheff ND; Curd EE; Barber PH; Meyer RS; Wayne R; Stolzenbach K; Prickett K; Luedy J; Wetzer R
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14071. PubMed ID: 36405018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spider webs as eDNA samplers: Biodiversity assessment across the tree of life.
Gregorič M; Kutnjak D; Bačnik K; Gostinčar C; Pecman A; Ravnikar M; Kuntner M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2534-2545. PubMed ID: 35510791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental DNA as an emerging tool in botanical research.
Johnson MD; Freeland JR; Parducci L; Evans DM; Meyer RS; Molano-Flores B; Davis MA
Am J Bot; 2023 Feb; 110(2):e16120. PubMed ID: 36632660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supervised machine learning improves general applicability of eDNA metabarcoding for reservoir health monitoring.
Hu H; Wei XY; Liu L; Wang YB; Jia HJ; Bu LK; Pei DS
Water Res; 2023 Nov; 246():120686. PubMed ID: 37812979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental DNA analysis for macro-organisms: species distribution and more.
Minamoto T
DNA Res; 2022 May; 29(3):. PubMed ID: 35652724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Airborne environmental DNA captures terrestrial vertebrate diversity in nature.
Lynggaard C; Frøslev TG; Johnson MS; Olsen MT; Bohmann K
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13840. PubMed ID: 37497670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decision-making and best practices for taxonomy-free environmental DNA metabarcoding in biomonitoring using Hill numbers.
Mächler E; Walser JC; Altermatt F
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3326-3339. PubMed ID: 33188644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extracellular DNA in Environmental Samples: Occurrence, Extraction, Quantification, and Impact on Microbial Biodiversity Assessment.
Bairoliya S; Koh Zhi Xiang J; Cao B
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2022 Feb; 88(3):e0184521. PubMed ID: 34818108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. eDNA in subterranean ecosystems: Applications, technical aspects, and future prospects.
Saccò M; Guzik MT; van der Heyde M; Nevill P; Cooper SJB; Austin AD; Coates PJ; Allentoft ME; White NE
Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 820():153223. PubMed ID: 35063529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A large scale temporal and spatial environmental DNA biodiversity survey of marine vertebrates in Brazil following the Fundão tailings dam failure.
Lines R; Juggernauth M; Peverley G; Keating J; Simpson T; Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M; Bunce M; Berry TE; Taysom A; Bernardino AF; Whittle P
Mar Environ Res; 2023 Nov; 192():106239. PubMed ID: 37926039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.
Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L
Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
