These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35653226)
1. Automated landmark identification on cone-beam computed tomography: Accuracy and reliability. Ghowsi A; Hatcher D; Suh H; Wile D; Castro W; Krueger J; Park J; Oh H Angle Orthod; 2022 Jun; 92(5):642-54. PubMed ID: 35653226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images. Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images. Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans. Schlicher W; Nielsen I; Huang JC; Maki K; Hatcher DC; Miller AJ Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 21385857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of 3D dental and skeletal landmarks on CBCT images. Park J; Baumrind S; Curry S; Carlson SK; Boyd RL; Oh H Angle Orthod; 2019 Sep; 89(5):758-767. PubMed ID: 30883187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic landmarking as a convenient prerequisite for geometric morphometrics. Validation on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)- based shape analysis of the nasal complex. Ridel AF; Demeter F; Galland M; L'abbé EN; Vandermeulen D; Oettlé AC Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110095. PubMed ID: 31841934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic landmark identification in cone-beam computed tomography. Gillot M; Miranda F; Baquero B; Ruellas A; Gurgel M; Al Turkestani N; Anchling L; Hutin N; Biggs E; Yatabe M; Paniagua B; Fillion-Robin JC; Allemang D; Bianchi J; Cevidanes L; Prieto JC Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):560-567. PubMed ID: 36811276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks. Blum FMS; Möhlhenrich SC; Raith S; Pankert T; Peters F; Wolf M; Hölzle F; Modabber A Clin Oral Investig; 2023 May; 27(5):2255-2265. PubMed ID: 37014502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses. Percival CJ; Devine J; Darwin BC; Liu W; van Eede M; Henkelman RM; Hallgrimsson B J Anat; 2019 Jun; 234(6):917-935. PubMed ID: 30901082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cranial base foramen location accuracy and reliability in cone-beam computerized tomography. Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Flores-Mir C; Carey J; Heo G; Major PW Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e203-10. PubMed ID: 21392663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Study on the method of automatically determining maxillary complex landmarks based on non-rigid registration algorithms]. Gao ZX; Wang J; Wen AN; Zhu YJ; Qin QZ; Wang Y; Zhao YJ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 58(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 37272000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The accuracy of a designed software for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks on CBCT images. Shahidi S; Bahrampour E; Soltanimehr E; Zamani A; Oshagh M; Moattari M; Mehdizadeh A BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Sep; 14():32. PubMed ID: 25223399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a multi-stage convolutional neural network-based fully automated landmark identification system using cone-beam computed tomographysynthesized posteroanterior cephalometric images. Kim MJ; Liu Y; Oh SH; Ahn HW; Kim SH; Nelson G Korean J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 51(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 33678623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT. Naji P; Alsufyani NA; Lagravère MO Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):762-72. PubMed ID: 24364751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between a human judge and automatic landmark identification on digital models. Dolatabadi N; Boyd RL; Oh H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Aug; 162(2):257-263. PubMed ID: 35933158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods. Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans. Liberton DK; Verma P; Contratto A; Lee JS J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):e611-e615. PubMed ID: 31478954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Malocclusion Class II division 1 skeletal and dental relationships measured by cone-beam computed tomography. Xu Y; Oh H; Lagravère MO Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):365-387. PubMed ID: 28818647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Landmark precision and reliability and accuracy of linear distances estimated by using 3D computed micro-tomography and the open-source TINA Manual Landmarking Tool software. Simon MN; Marroig G Front Zool; 2015; 12():12. PubMed ID: 26120349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular canal changes assessed using three-dimensional imaging (CBCT). Asaria I; Lagravère MO Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):712-732. PubMed ID: 30343067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]