These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35653442)

  • 1. A Review of Recent Advances and Future Developments in Fetal Phonocardiography.
    Kahankova R; Mikolasova M; Jaros R; Barnova K; Ladrova M; Martinek R
    IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2023; 16():653-671. PubMed ID: 35653442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wavelet filtering of fetal phonocardiography: A comparative analysis.
    Tomassini S; Strazza A; Sbrollini A; Marcantoni I; Morettini M; Fioretti S; Burattini L
    Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Jun; 16(5):6034-6046. PubMed ID: 31499751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extended noninvasive fetal monitoring by detailed analysis of data measured with phonocardiography.
    Kovács F; Horváth C; Balogh AT; Hosszú G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jan; 58(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 20813630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Passive fetal monitoring by adaptive wavelet denoising method.
    Vaisman S; Salem SY; Holcberg G; Geva AB
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Feb; 42(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 22169397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design methodology of a new wavelet basis function for fetal phonocardiographic signals.
    Chourasia VS; Tiwari AK
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():505840. PubMed ID: 23766693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-invasive fetal monitoring using electrocardiography and phonocardiography: A preliminary study.
    Gobillot S; Fontecave-Jallon J; Equy V; Rivet B; Gumery PY; Hoffmann P
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 47(9):455-459. PubMed ID: 30144558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of fetal heart rate in healthy and pathological pregnancies using wavelet-based features.
    Spyridou KK; Hadjileontiadis LJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1908-11. PubMed ID: 18002355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Foetal phonocardiographic signal denoising based on non-negative matrix factorization.
    Chourasia VS; Tiwari AK; Gangopadhyay R; Akant KA
    J Med Eng Technol; 2012 Jan; 36(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 22136609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection of mother wavelet and denoising algorithm for analysis of foetal phonocardiographic signals.
    Chourasia VS; Mittra AK
    J Med Eng Technol; 2009; 33(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 19484684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A rule-based phonocardiographic method for long-term fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Kovács F; Török M; Habermajer I
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jan; 47(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 10646287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real time processing and analysis of fetal phonocardiographic signals.
    Bassil HE; Dripps JH
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1989; 10 Suppl B():67-74. PubMed ID: 2630163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Phonocardiographic-Based Fiber-Optic Sensor and Adaptive Filtering System for Noninvasive Continuous Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring.
    Martinek R; Nedoma J; Fajkus M; Kahankova R; Konecny J; Janku P; Kepak S; Bilik P; Nazeran H
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28420215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal phonocardiography--past and future possibilities.
    Kovács F; Horváth C; Balogh AT; Hosszú G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Oct; 104(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 21146247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-lead noninvasive fetal ECG extraction by means of combining clustering and principal components analysis.
    Zhang Y; Yu S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Feb; 58(2):419-432. PubMed ID: 31858419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. De-noising the abdominal phonogram for foetal heart rate extraction: blind source separation versus empirical filtering.
    Jiménez-González A; James CJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1358-61. PubMed ID: 24109948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heart rate estimation and validation algorithm for fetal phonocardiography.
    Bhaskaran A; J SK; George S; Arora M
    Physiol Meas; 2022 Jul; 43(7):. PubMed ID: 35724646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can empirical mode decomposition improve heartbeat detection in fetal phonocardiography signals?
    Vican I; Kreković G; Jambrošić K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 May; 203():106038. PubMed ID: 33770544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of beat by beat fetal heart signals acquired from four-channel fetal phonocardiogram with fetal electrocardiogram in healthy late pregnancy.
    Khandoker A; Ibrahim E; Oshio S; Kimura Y
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13635. PubMed ID: 30206289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Review of Signal Processing Techniques for Non-Invasive Fetal Electrocardiography.
    Kahankova R; Martinek R; Jaros R; Behbehani K; Matonia A; Jezewski M; Behar JA
    IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2020; 13():51-73. PubMed ID: 31478873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal electrocardiogram extraction by blind source subspace separation.
    De Lathauwer L; De Moor B; Vandewalle J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 May; 47(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 10851798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.