162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35654131)
1. Comparison of transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement and Bishop score for predicting labour induction outcomes.
Vince K; Poljičanin T; Matijević R
J Perinat Med; 2022 Nov; 50(9):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 35654131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, Bishop score, and sonographic cervical length: tolerability and prediction of vaginal birth and vaginal birth within 24 hours following labour induction in nulliparous women.
Vallikkannu N; Lam WK; Omar SZ; Tan PC
BJOG; 2017 Jul; 124(8):1274-1283. PubMed ID: 27348806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial.
Abdullah ZHA; Chew KT; Velayudham VRV; Yahaya Z; Jamil AAM; Abu MA; Ghani NAA; Ismail NAM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262387. PubMed ID: 35081157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of the Manipal Cervical Scoring System for predicting successful induction of labour.
Mohamed El Bishry G; Serag Allam I; Rasheedy R; Mahmoud A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Nov; 39(8):1057-1064. PubMed ID: 31046494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length versus Bishop score in labor induction at term for prediction of caesarean delivery.
Alanwar A; Hussein SH; Allam HA; Hussein AM; Abdelazim IA; Abbas AM; Elsayed M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jul; 34(13):2146-2153. PubMed ID: 31438737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women.
Keepanasseril A; Suri V; Bagga R; Aggarwal N
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 47(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 17877596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Manipal Cervical Scoring System by Transvaginal Ultrasound in Predicting Successful Labour Induction.
Bajpai N; Bhakta R; Kumar P; Rai L; Hebbar S
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 May; 9(5):QC04-9. PubMed ID: 26155521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of posterior cervical angle and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Al-Adwy AM; Sobh SM; Belal DS; Omran EF; Hassan A; Saad AH; Afifi MM; Nada AM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Apr; 141(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 29224196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
Gómez Laencina AM; Sánchez FG; Gimenez JH; Martínez MS; Valverde Martínez JA; Vizcaíno VM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.
Ezebialu IU; Eke AC; Eleje GU; Nwachukwu CE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010762. PubMed ID: 26068943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transvaginal two-dimensional ultrasound measurement of cervical volume to predict the outcome of the induction of labour: a prospective observational study.
Athulathmudali SR; Patabendige M; Chandrasinghe SK; De Silva PHP
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jun; 21(1):433. PubMed ID: 34158010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of elastography in predicting the outcome of Foley catheter labour induction.
Wozniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Paszkowski T
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun; 55(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 26044410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of cervical Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in the prediction of the course and outcome of induced labour.
Jokhi RP; Brown BH; Anumba DO
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2009 Sep; 9():40. PubMed ID: 19725953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic cervical length predicts vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section in women with low Bishop score induced with a double-balloon catheter.
Diaz A; Aedo S; Burky D; Catalan A; Aguirre C; Acevedo M; Poehls R; Puebla V; Guerra F; Sepulveda W
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(24):4830-4836. PubMed ID: 33401988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
