163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35654131)
21. Cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography versus Bishop score to predict successful labour induction in term pregnancies.
Groeneveld YJ; Bohnen AM; Van Heusden AM
Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2010; 2(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 25013711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women.
Daskalakis G; Thomakos N; Hatziioannou L; Mesogitis S; Papantoniou N; Antsaklis A
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2006; 21(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 16354972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Gillor M; Vaisbuch E; Zaks S; Barak O; Hagay Z; Levy R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27062415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
Gómez-Laencina AM; García CP; Asensio LV; Ponce JA; Martínez MS; Martínez-Vizcaíno V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 22198844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prediction of failed labor induction in parous women at term: role of previous obstetric history, digital examination and sonographic measurement of cervical length.
Park KH; Hong JS; Shin DM; Kang WS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Apr; 35(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 19708177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predicting labor induction success by cervical funneling in uncomplicated pregnancies.
Kim YN; Kwon JY; Kim EH
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1077-1083. PubMed ID: 32390283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.
Park KH; Kim SN; Lee SY; Jeong EH; Jung HJ; Oh KJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21484904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Ultrasonographic score for predicting vaginal delivery within 24h of induction: a pilot study].
Ancel J; Huissoud C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 25727164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery.
Cubal A; Carvalho J; Ferreira MJ; Rodrigues G; Carmo OD
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23815073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction.
Lu J; Cheng YKY; Ho SYS; Sahota DS; Hui LL; Poon LC; Leung TY
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 31691266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.
Elghorori MR; Hassan I; Dartey W; Abdel-Aziz E; Bradley M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultrasound cervical length measurement in prediction of labor induction outcome.
Kehila M; Abouda HS; Sahbi K; Cheour H; Chanoufi MB
J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2016 May; 9(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 27197935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transvaginal sonography of cervical length and Bishop score as predictors of successful induction of term labor: the effect of parity.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2009; 36(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 19400416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction.
Ware V; Raynor BD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 182(5):1030-2. PubMed ID: 10819818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Transvaginal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix before induction of labor].
Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quéreux C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2001 Dec; 29(12):919-23. PubMed ID: 11802557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of elastosonography and digital examination of cervix for consistency to predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labor with oxytocin.
Gultekin S; Gultekin IB; Icer B; Yilmaz E; Alkan A; Kucukozkan T
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Dec; 30(23):2795-2799. PubMed ID: 27868465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Effect of Ultrasound-Measured Preinduction Cervical Length on Delivery Outcome in a Low-Resource Setting.
Anikwe CC; Okorochukwu BC; Uchendu E; Ikeoha CC
ScientificWorldJournal; 2020; 2020():8273154. PubMed ID: 32410909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predictors of perinatal outcomes and economic costs for late-term induction of labour.
Oros D; Garcia-Simon R; Clemente J; Fabre E; Romero MA; Montañes A
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 56(3):286-290. PubMed ID: 28600035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
