These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35655469)

  • 1. Robotic Surgery Techniques to Improve Traditional Laparoscopy.
    Williamson T; Song SE
    JSLS; 2022; 26(2):. PubMed ID: 35655469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnet-Assisted Robotic Prostatectomy Using the da Vinci SP Robot: An Initial Case Series.
    Steinberg RL; Johnson BA; Meskawi M; Gettman MT; Cadeddu JA
    J Endourol; 2019 Oct; 33(10):829-834. PubMed ID: 31411052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Essential Elements of a Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
    Simpson KM; Advincula AP
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2016 Sep; 43(3):479-93. PubMed ID: 27521880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of robotics on the mode of benign hysterectomy and clinical outcomes.
    Luciano AA; Luciano DE; Gabbert J; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 25753111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
    Scheib SA; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Future of robotic surgery in urology.
    Rassweiler JJ; Autorino R; Klein J; Mottrie A; Goezen AS; Stolzenburg JU; Rha KH; Schurr M; Kaouk J; Patel V; Dasgupta P; Liatsikos E
    BJU Int; 2017 Dec; 120(6):822-841. PubMed ID: 28319324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use?
    Fanfani F; Restaino S; Ercoli A; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Gallotta V; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Scambia G
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Aug; 68(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 26633042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends and survival outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery for stage II uterine cancer.
    Abel MK; Chan JK; Chow S; Darcy K; Tian C; Kapp DS; Mann AK; Liao CI
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1347-1355. PubMed ID: 32753561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does transition from the da Vinci Si to Xi robotic platform impact single-docking technique for robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy?
    Patel MN; Aboumohamed A; Hemal A
    BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):990-4. PubMed ID: 26123244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy.
    Buderath P; Kimmig R
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26605432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing robotic prostatectomy costs by minimizing instrumentation.
    Delto JC; Wayne G; Yanes R; Nieder AM; Bhandari A
    J Endourol; 2015 May; 29(5):556-60. PubMed ID: 25333511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Status of robotic assistance--a less traumatic and more accurate minimally invasive surgery?
    Kenngott HG; Fischer L; Nickel F; Rom J; Rassweiler J; Müller-Stich BP
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2012 Mar; 397(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 22038293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.
    Coughlin GD; Yaxley JW; Chambers SK; Occhipinti S; Samaratunga H; Zajdlewicz L; Teloken P; Dunglison N; Williams S; Lavin MF; Gardiner RA
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 30017351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term satisfaction of patients after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
    Gitas G; Alkatout I; Proppe L; Hanker L; Allahqoli L; Grimbizis G; Rody A; Werner N; Sommer S; Baum S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Jun; 305(6):1481-1490. PubMed ID: 34954814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy after Previous Bladder Outlet Surgery: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Comparative Studies.
    Veccia A; Antonelli A; Francavilla S; Porpiglia F; Simeone C; Lima E; Zargar H; Eun D; Hampton LJ; Autorino R
    J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):511-517. PubMed ID: 31039100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Fachechi G; Corso S; Pirovano C; Trio C; Villa M; Turoli D; Youssef A
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 27460843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally Invasive Surgery to Treat Gynecological Cancer: Conventional Laparoscopy and/or Robot-Assisted Surgery.
    Minig L; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Zanagnolo V
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Mar; 27(3):562-574. PubMed ID: 28187093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.