BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35656686)

  • 1. Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Implant-supported Cement-retained Crowns with Short Abutments: An
    Kalla K; Arunachalam S; Behera SSP; Konchada J; Lankapalli S; Vanisetti L
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec; 22(12):1451-1456. PubMed ID: 35656686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants.
    Sheets JL; Wilcox C; Wilwerding T
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 17971122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Shahriari A; Steiner M; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of cement type and abutment height on pull-off force of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns on titanium implant stock abutments: an in vitro study.
    Müller L; Rauch A; Reissmann DR; Schierz O
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Nov; 21(1):592. PubMed ID: 34798850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
    Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.