195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35657932)
1. CI-SpliceAI-Improving machine learning predictions of disease causing splicing variants using curated alternative splice sites.
Strauch Y; Lord J; Niranjan M; Baralle D
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269159. PubMed ID: 35657932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays.
Riepe TV; Khan M; Roosing S; Cremers FPM; 't Hoen PAC
Hum Mutat; 2021 Jul; 42(7):799-810. PubMed ID: 33942434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance evaluation of computational methods for splice-disrupting variants and improving the performance using the machine learning-based framework.
Liu H; Dai J; Li K; Sun Y; Wei H; Wang H; Zhao C; Wang DW
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35976049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining full-length gene assay and SpliceAI to interpret the splicing impact of all possible SPINK1 coding variants.
Wu H; Lin JH; Tang XY; Marenne G; Zou WB; Schutz S; Masson E; Génin E; Fichou Y; Le Gac G; Férec C; Liao Z; Chen JM
Hum Genomics; 2024 Feb; 18(1):21. PubMed ID: 38414044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance Evaluation of SpliceAI for the Prediction of Splicing of
Ha C; Kim JW; Jang JH
Genes (Basel); 2021 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 34573290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of
Jang W; Park J; Chae H; Kim M
Int J Genomics; 2022; 2022():5265686. PubMed ID: 36275637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SPiP: Splicing Prediction Pipeline, a machine learning tool for massive detection of exonic and intronic variant effects on mRNA splicing.
Leman R; Parfait B; Vidaud D; Girodon E; Pacot L; Le Gac G; Ka C; Ferec C; Fichou Y; Quesnelle C; Aucouturier C; Muller E; Vaur D; Castera L; Boulouard F; Ricou A; Tubeuf H; Soukarieh O; Gaildrat P; Riant F; Guillaud-Bataille M; Caputo SM; Caux-Moncoutier V; Boutry-Kryza N; Bonnet-Dorion F; Schultz I; Rossing M; Quenez O; Goldenberg L; Harter V; Parsons MT; Spurdle AB; Frébourg T; Martins A; Houdayer C; Krieger S
Hum Mutat; 2022 Dec; 43(12):2308-2323. PubMed ID: 36273432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays.
Smith C; Kitzman JO
Genome Biol; 2023 Dec; 24(1):294. PubMed ID: 38129864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining genetic constraint with predictions of alternative splicing to prioritize deleterious splicing in rare disease studies.
Cormier MJ; Pedersen BS; Bayrak-Toydemir P; Quinlan AR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):482. PubMed ID: 36376793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Introme accurately predicts the impact of coding and noncoding variants on gene splicing, with clinical applications.
Sullivan PJ; Gayevskiy V; Davis RL; Wong M; Mayoh C; Mallawaarachchi A; Hort Y; McCabe MJ; Beecroft S; Jackson MR; Arts P; Dubowsky A; Laing N; Dinger ME; Scott HS; Oates E; Pinese M; Cowley MJ
Genome Biol; 2023 May; 24(1):118. PubMed ID: 37198692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretable prioritization of splice variants in diagnostic next-generation sequencing.
Danis D; Jacobsen JOB; Carmody LC; Gargano MA; McMurry JA; Hegde A; Haendel MA; Valentini G; Smedley D; Robinson PN
Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Sep; 108(9):1564-1577. PubMed ID: 34289339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SpliceAI-visual: a free online tool to improve SpliceAI splicing variant interpretation.
de Sainte Agathe JM; Filser M; Isidor B; Besnard T; Gueguen P; Perrin A; Van Goethem C; Verebi C; Masingue M; Rendu J; Cossée M; Bergougnoux A; Frobert L; Buratti J; Lejeune É; Le Guern É; Pasquier F; Clot F; Kalatzis V; Roux AF; Cogné B; Baux D
Hum Genomics; 2023 Feb; 17(1):7. PubMed ID: 36765386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computational prediction of human deep intronic variation.
Barbosa P; Savisaar R; Carmo-Fonseca M; Fonseca A
Gigascience; 2022 Dec; 12():. PubMed ID: 37878682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes.
Moles-Fernández A; Domènech-Vivó J; Tenés A; Balmaña J; Diez O; Gutiérrez-Enríquez S
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Jul; 13(13):. PubMed ID: 34283047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MutPred Splice: machine learning-based prediction of exonic variants that disrupt splicing.
Mort M; Sterne-Weiler T; Li B; Ball EV; Cooper DN; Radivojac P; Sanford JR; Mooney SD
Genome Biol; 2014 Jan; 15(1):R19. PubMed ID: 24451234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined Bioinformatic and Splicing Analysis of Likely Benign Intronic and Synonymous Variants Reveals Evidence for Pathogenicity.
Hirschi OR; Felker SA; Rednam SP; Vallance KL; Parsons DW; Roy A; Cooper GM; Plon SE
medRxiv; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37961416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blood RNA analysis can increase clinical diagnostic rate and resolve variants of uncertain significance.
Wai HA; Lord J; Lyon M; Gunning A; Kelly H; Cibin P; Seaby EG; Spiers-Fitzgerald K; Lye J; Ellard S; Thomas NS; Bunyan DJ; Douglas AGL; Baralle D;
Genet Med; 2020 Jun; 22(6):1005-1014. PubMed ID: 32123317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Experimentally Obtained Functional Impact Assessments of 5' Splice Site GT'GC Variants Differ Markedly from Those Predicted.
Chen JM; Lin JH; Masson E; Liao Z; Férec C; Cooper DN; Hayden M
Curr Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 32655299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SpliceVault predicts the precise nature of variant-associated mis-splicing.
Dawes R; Bournazos AM; Bryen SJ; Bommireddipalli S; Marchant RG; Joshi H; Cooper ST
Nat Genet; 2023 Feb; 55(2):324-332. PubMed ID: 36747048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Splam: a deep-learning-based splice site predictor that improves spliced alignments.
Chao KH; Mao A; Salzberg SL; Pertea M
bioRxiv; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37546880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
