128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35657985)
1. Comparison of abortion incidence estimates derived from direct survey questions versus the list experiment among women in Ohio.
Hood RB; Moseson H; Smith M; Chakraborty P; Norris AH; Gallo MF
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269476. PubMed ID: 35657985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reducing underreporting of stigmatized pregnancy outcomes: results from a mixed-methods study of self-managed abortion in Texas using the list-experiment method.
Moseson H; Filippa S; Baum SE; Gerdts C; Grossman D
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):113. PubMed ID: 31481033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing under-reporting of stigmatized health events using the List Experiment: results from a randomized, population-based study of abortion in Liberia.
Moseson H; Massaquoi M; Dehlendorf C; Bawo L; Dahn B; Zolia Y; Vittinghoff E; Hiatt RA; Gerdts C
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 44(6):1951-8. PubMed ID: 26342584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing underreporting of abortion in surveys: Results from two test applications of the list experiment method in Malawi and Senegal.
Moseson H; Jayaweera R; Huber-Krum S; Garver S; Norris A; Gerdts C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247201. PubMed ID: 33657126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Application of the List Experiment to Estimate Abortion Prevalence in Karachi, Pakistan.
Huber-Krum S; Hackett K; Kaur N; Nausheen S; Soofi S; Canning D; Shah I
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2020 Dec; 46(Suppl 1):13-24. PubMed ID: 33326396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the lifetime incidence of induced abortion and understanding abortion practices in a Northeastern Tanzania community through a household survey.
Elewonibi B; Amour C; Gleason S; Msuya S; Canning D; Shah I
Contraception; 2021 Feb; 103(2):127-131. PubMed ID: 33098850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can a List Experiment Improve Validity of Abortion Measurement?
Bell SO; Bishai D
Stud Fam Plann; 2019 Mar; 50(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 30675727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating Prevalence of Abortion Using List Experiments: Findings from a Survey of Women in Delaware and Maryland.
Kissling A; Jackson HM
Womens Health Issues; 2022; 32(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 34556399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can you repeat the question? Paradata as a lens to understand respondent experience answering cognitively demanding, sensitive questions.
Bell SO; Bishai D
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252512. PubMed ID: 34097702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia.
Moseson H; Gerdts C; Dehlendorf C; Hiatt RA; Vittinghoff E
Popul Health Metr; 2017 Dec; 15(1):40. PubMed ID: 29268794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized experimental testing of new survey approaches to improve abortion reporting in the United States.
Lindberg LD; Maddow-Zimet I; Mueller J; VandeVusse A
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2022 Dec; 54(4):142-155. PubMed ID: 36511507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving abortion underreporting in the USA: a cognitive interview study.
Mueller J; Kirstein M; VandeVusse A; Lindberg LD
Cult Health Sex; 2023 Jan; 25(1):126-141. PubMed ID: 36007884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "Have you ever wanted or needed an abortion you did not get?" Data from a 2022 nationally representative online survey in the United States.
Bennett AH; Marshall C; Kimport K; Deardorff J; Gómez AM
Contraception; 2023 Jul; 123():110007. PubMed ID: 36931550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discrepant abortion reporting by interview methodology among men from the United States National Survey of Family Growth (2015-2017).
Li VM; Heyrana KJ; Nguyen BT
Contraception; 2022 Aug; 112():111-115. PubMed ID: 35122730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating abortion prevalence and understanding perspectives of community leaders and providers: Results from a mixed-method study in Istanbul, Turkey.
Huber-Krum S; Karadon D; Kurutas S; Rohr J; Baykal SS; Okcuoglu BA; Esmer Y; Canning D; Shah I
Womens Health (Lond); 2020; 16():1745506520953353. PubMed ID: 32853055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The List Experiment for Measuring Abortion: What We Know and What We Need.
Moseson H; Treleaven E; Gerdts C; Diamond-Smith N
Stud Fam Plann; 2017 Dec; 48(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 29148056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel approaches to estimating abortion incidence.
Sedgh G; Keogh SC
Reprod Health; 2019 Apr; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 30999917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The list experiment: An approach to measuring stigmatized behaviours related to sex-selective abortion.
Treleaven E; Pham TN; Nguyen AD; Diamond-Smith N
Popul Stud (Camb); 2021 Nov; 75(3):363-380. PubMed ID: 33792524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ohio survey data assessing perceptions of abortion safety.
Madzia J; Kudrimoti M; Turner AN; Bessett D; Gallo MF
Contraception; 2022 Jun; 110():86-92. PubMed ID: 34971612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence of Self-Managed Abortion Among Women of Reproductive Age in the United States.
Ralph L; Foster DG; Raifman S; Biggs MA; Samari G; Upadhyay U; Gerdts C; Grossman D
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2029245. PubMed ID: 33337493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
