135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35658685)
1. Including a Vessel Loop in Wound Closure Facilitates Suture Removal Following Open Carpal Tunnel Release.
Frazier MC; Tomooka LBH; Foeger N; Hagan HJ; Apel PJ
Hand (N Y); 2023 Jan; 18(1_suppl):84S-90S. PubMed ID: 35658685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.
Wade RG; Wormald JC; Figus A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 2(2):CD011757. PubMed ID: 29390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of Monocryl versus nylon sutures on patient- and observer-assessed outcomes following carpal tunnel surgery.
Wu E; Allen R; Bayne C; Szabo R
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2023 Nov; 48(10):1014-1021. PubMed ID: 37293819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of surgical wound closure with nylon interrupted sutures and running subcuticular vicryl rapide suture after open release of the carpal tunnel.
Tzimas V; Kotsias C; Galanis C; Panagiotakopoulos G; Tsiampas D; Parnis J; Tilkeridis K; Fiska A
Scars Burn Heal; 2022; 8():20595131221128951. PubMed ID: 36200049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparison of Tissue Adhesive Material and Suture as Wound-Closure Techniques following Carpal Tunnel Decompression: A Single-Center Randomized Control Trial.
Sunjic Roguljic V; Roguljic L; Kovacic V; Jukic I
J Clin Med; 2023 Apr; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 37109201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcome and cost comparison of carpal tunnel wound closure with monocryl and ethilon: a prospective study.
Dosani A; Khan SK; Gray S; Joseph S; Whittaker IA
Hand Surg; 2013; 18(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 24164122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial.
Suwannaphisit S; Aonsong W; Suwanno P; Yuenyongviwat V
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Sep; 16(1):565. PubMed ID: 34535166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcome and wound healing following carpal tunnel decompression: a comparison of two common suture materials.
MacFarlane RJ; Donnelly TD; Khan Y; Morapudi S; Waseem M; Fischer J
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():270137. PubMed ID: 25165693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.
Gurusamy KS; Toon CD; Allen VB; Davidson BR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD010365. PubMed ID: 24526375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction compared between staples and subcuticular suture technique for wound closure after primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Nepal S; Ruangsomboon P; Udomkiat P; Unnanuntana A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Sep; 140(9):1255-1263. PubMed ID: 32424445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release.
Theopold C; Potter S; Dempsey M; O'Shaughnessy M
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2012 May; 37(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 21987279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin closure in carpal tunnel surgery: a prospective comparative study between nylon, polyglactin 910 and stainless steel sutures.
Menovsky T; Bartels RH; van Lindert EL; Grotenhuis JA
Hand Surg; 2004 Jul; 9(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15368623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.
Sah AP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2019-27. PubMed ID: 25631171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Foot and Ankle Surgical Incision Closure With Three Different Materials.
Yao D; Nachtsheim J; Ettinger S; Altemeier A; Claassen L; Plaass C; Schwarze M; Daniilidis K; Brüggenjürgen B; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Lerch M
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2022; 61(4):760-765. PubMed ID: 35370050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of skin closure by using mattress sutures or intracutaneous absorbable sutures after the Karydakis flap surgery because of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. A comparative analysis.
Ekici U; Ferhatoglu MF
Ann Ital Chir; 2019; 90():474-479. PubMed ID: 31158103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prospective Randomized Control Study Comparing the Effects of Dermal Staples and Intradermal Sutures on Postoperative Scarring After Thyroidectomy.
Ku D; Koo DH; Bae DS
J Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 256():413-421. PubMed ID: 32791393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized Controlled Trial of Topical Skin Adhesive vs Nylon Sutures for Incision Closure in Forefoot Surgery.
Lewis TL; Goff TAJ; Ray R; Varrall CR; Robinson PW; Fogarty K; Chang A; Dhaliwal J; Dearden PMC; Wines A
Foot Ankle Int; 2021 Sep; 42(9):1106-1114. PubMed ID: 33870760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomised clinical trial to compare octyl cyanoacrylate with absorbable monofilament sutures for the closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy port incisions.
Ben Safta Y; Maatouk M; Bouzidi MT; Sakly N; Mabrouk A; Bouafif M; Sghaier S; Maghraoui H; Dziri C; Ben Moussa M
Int Wound J; 2020 Apr; 17(2):449-454. PubMed ID: 31854119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
