BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35659928)

  • 1. Genotype error biases trio-based estimates of haplotype phase accuracy.
    Browning BL; Browning SR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Jun; 109(6):1016-1025. PubMed ID: 35659928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical phasing of 150,119 sequenced genomes in the UK Biobank.
    Browning BL; Browning SR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2023 Jan; 110(1):161-165. PubMed ID: 36450278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the Genome-wide Mutation Rate with Three-Way Identity by Descent.
    Tian X; Browning BL; Browning SR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Nov; 105(5):883-893. PubMed ID: 31587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. trioPhaser: using Mendelian inheritance logic to improve genomic phasing of trios.
    Miller DB; Piccolo SR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):559. PubMed ID: 34809557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous estimation of genotype error and uncalled deletion rates in whole genome sequence data.
    Masaki N; Browning SR; Browning BL
    PLoS Genet; 2024 May; 20(5):e1011297. PubMed ID: 38787916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals.
    Browning BL; Browning SR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2009 Feb; 84(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 19200528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of phasing algorithms for trios and unrelated individuals.
    Marchini J; Cutler D; Patterson N; Stephens M; Eskin E; Halperin E; Lin S; Qin ZS; Munro HM; Abecasis GR; Donnelly P;
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Mar; 78(3):437-50. PubMed ID: 16465620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotype calling and haplotyping in parent-offspring trios.
    Chen W; Li B; Zeng Z; Sanna S; Sidore C; Busonero F; Kang HM; Li Y; Abecasis GR
    Genome Res; 2013 Jan; 23(1):142-51. PubMed ID: 23064751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fast two-stage phasing of large-scale sequence data.
    Browning BL; Tian X; Zhou Y; Browning SR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Oct; 108(10):1880-1890. PubMed ID: 34478634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benchmarking phasing software with a whole-genome sequenced cattle pedigree.
    Oget-Ebrad C; Kadri NK; Moreira GCM; Karim L; Coppieters W; Georges M; Druet T
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):130. PubMed ID: 35164677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of haplotype frequency estimation for biallelic loci, via the expectation-maximization algorithm for unphased diploid genotype data.
    Fallin D; Schork NJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 67(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 10954684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genotype calling and phasing using next-generation sequencing reads and a haplotype scaffold.
    Menelaou A; Marchini J
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Jan; 29(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 23093610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A strategy to improve phasing of whole-genome sequenced individuals through integration of familial information from dense genotype panels.
    Faux P; Druet T
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):46. PubMed ID: 28511677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phasing millions of samples achieves near perfect accuracy, enabling parent-of-origin classification of variants.
    Williams CM; O'Connell J; Freyman WA; ; Gignoux CR; Ramachandran S; Williams AL
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38766004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phasing quality assessment in a brown layer population through family- and population-based software.
    Frioni N; Cavero D; Simianer H; Erbe M
    BMC Genet; 2019 Jul; 20(1):57. PubMed ID: 31311514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Haplotype estimation using sequencing reads.
    Delaneau O; Howie B; Cox AJ; Zagury JF; Marchini J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2013 Oct; 93(4):687-96. PubMed ID: 24094745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical vs Bayesian approach for estimating haplotypes from genotypes of unrelated individuals.
    Li SS; Cheng JJ; Zhao LP
    BMC Genet; 2007 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 17261196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using DNA pools for genotyping trios.
    Beckman KB; Abel KJ; Braun A; Halperin E
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(19):e129. PubMed ID: 17020923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Little loss of information due to unknown phase for fine-scale linkage-disequilibrium mapping with single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotype data.
    Morris AP; Whittaker JC; Balding DJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 May; 74(5):945-53. PubMed ID: 15077198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of linkage disequilibrium estimated from genotypes versus haplotypes for crossbred populations.
    Alemu SW; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Liu H; Fernando RL; Dekkers JCM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Feb; 54(1):12. PubMed ID: 35135468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.