336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35660049)
21. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A systematic approach towards optimization of brackish groundwater treatment using nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) hybrid membrane filtration system.
Srivastava A; Singh R; Rajput VD; Minkina T; Agarwal S; Garg MC
Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135230. PubMed ID: 35688189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes to the salty and polluted surface water.
Koyuncu I; Yazgan M
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2001; 36(7):1321-33. PubMed ID: 11545356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Removal of organic contaminants by RO and NF membranes.
Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
J Memb Sci; 2005 Sep; 261(1-2):76-86. PubMed ID: 16134262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Dolar D; Vuković A; Asperger D; Kosutić K
J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(8):1299-307. PubMed ID: 22128537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling for the performance evaluation of pilot-scale hybrid nanofiltration (NF) & reverse osmosis (RO) membrane system for the treatment of brackish ground water.
Srivastava A; K A; Nair A; Ram S; Agarwal S; Ali J; Singh R; Garg MC
J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 1):111497. PubMed ID: 33130432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Recycling of end-of-life reverse osmosis membranes for membrane biofilms reactors (MBfRs). Effect of chlorination on the membrane surface and gas permeability.
Morón-López J; Nieto-Reyes L; Aguado S; El-Shehawy R; Molina S
Chemosphere; 2019 Sep; 231():103-112. PubMed ID: 31128344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of fouling mechanisms on reverse osmosis (RO) membrane during permeation of 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) solutions.
Moreira CG; Santos HG; Bila DM; da Fonseca FV
Environ Technol; 2022 Aug; 43(20):3084-3096. PubMed ID: 33843467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modeling micropollutant removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: considerations and challenges.
Castaño Osorio S; Biesheuvel PM; Spruijt E; Dykstra JE; van der Wal A
Water Res; 2022 Oct; 225():119130. PubMed ID: 36240724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of feed solution characteristics and membrane fouling on the removal of THMs by UF/NF/RO membranes.
Fang C; Ou T; Wang X; Rui M; Chu W
Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 260():127625. PubMed ID: 32758776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cyclophosphamide removal from water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane.
Wang L; Albasi C; Faucet-Marquis V; Pfohl-Leszkowicz A; Dorandeu C; Marion B; Causserand C
Water Res; 2009 Sep; 43(17):4115-22. PubMed ID: 19592068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing the performance of various nanofiltration membranes in advanced oxidation-nanofiltration treatment of reverse osmosis concentrates.
Li N; Wang X; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Ding J; Lu J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(17):17472-17481. PubMed ID: 31020525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recent progress in the applications of layer-by-layer assembly to the preparation of nanostructured ion-rejecting water purification membranes.
Sanyal O; Lee I
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2014 Mar; 14(3):2178-89. PubMed ID: 24745210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does Surface Roughness Necessarily Increase the Fouling Propensity of Polyamide Reverse Osmosis Membranes by Humic Acid?
Gan Q; Wu C; Long L; Peng LE; Yang Z; Guo H; Tang CY
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Feb; 57(6):2548-2556. PubMed ID: 36719958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Modeling the effect of charge density in the active layers of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes on the rejection of arsenic(III) and potassium iodide.
Coronell O; Mi B; Mariñas BJ; Cahill DG
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):420-8. PubMed ID: 23199291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
