These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3566056)

  • 21. [Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in neonatology: the method and results in a group of normal newborns].
    Pasanisi E; Bacciu S; Fava G; Dallatomasina M; Bacciu A; Negri M; Piazza F; Montali S
    Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 1996; 67(5-6):191-5. PubMed ID: 10021703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Immaturity of electrophysiological response of the neonatal auditory brainstem to high repetition rates of click stimulation.
    Jiang ZD; Brosi DM; Wilkinson AR
    Early Hum Dev; 1998 Sep; 52(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 9783815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effect of the repetition frequency of acoustic stimulation on the time and amplitude characteristics of the auditory evoked potential of the human brain stem].
    Tavartkiladze GA; Martynov NG
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1984; (2):11-7. PubMed ID: 6710749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Amplitude change with click rate in human brainstem auditory-evoked responses.
    Jiang ZD; Wu YY; Zhang L
    Audiology; 1991; 30(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 1953446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Brain stem evoked response audiometry in neonates.
    Mandal AK; Mehra YN; Narang A; Raghunathan M; Walia BN
    Indian Pediatr; 1989 Jun; 26(6):566-70. PubMed ID: 2583808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory brain stem response in neurologically normal preterm and full-term newborn infants.
    Fawer CL; Dubowitz LM
    Neuropediatrics; 1982 Nov; 13(4):200-6. PubMed ID: 7155304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selective attention affects human brain stem frequency-following response.
    Galbraith GC; Olfman DM; Huffman TM
    Neuroreport; 2003 Apr; 14(5):735-8. PubMed ID: 12692473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of auditory brain stem evoked potentials in hyperlipidemics and normolipemic subjects.
    Ben-David Y; Pratt H; Landman L; Fradis M; Podoshin L; Yeshurun D
    Laryngoscope; 1986 Feb; 96(2):186-9. PubMed ID: 3945147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Brainstem response to speech and non-speech stimuli in children with learning problems.
    Malayeri S; Lotfi Y; Moossavi SA; Rostami R; Faghihzadeh S
    Hear Res; 2014 Jul; 313():75-82. PubMed ID: 24823662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are click-evoked BAEPs useful in case of neonate hyperbilirubinemia?
    Soares I; Collet L; Delorme C; Salle B; Morgon A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1989 Jul; 17(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 2767895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory brainstem responses from human adults and infants: influence of stimulus onset.
    Folsom RC; Aurich CD
    Audiology; 1987; 26(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 3606471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of contralateral and ipsilateral masking of acoustic stimulation on the latencies of auditory evoked potentials from cochlea and brain stem.
    Boezeman EH; Kapteyn TS; Visser SL; Snel AM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Jun; 55(6):710-3. PubMed ID: 6189701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of stimulus intensity variation on brain-stem auditory evoked potentials: comparison between neonates and adults.
    Collet L; Delorme C; Chanal JM; Dubreuil C; Morgon A; Salle B
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 May; 68(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 2436884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The importance of phase of stimulus and the reference recording electrode in brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Hughes JR; Fino J; Gagnon L
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Jun; 51(6):611-23. PubMed ID: 6165562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory brainstem and cortical potentials following bone-anchored hearing aid stimulation.
    Rahne T; Ehelebe T; Rasinski C; Götze G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Nov; 193(2):300-6. PubMed ID: 20875458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences of latencies and amplitudes of brain stem evoked potentials in subgroups of a normal material.
    Kjaer M
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1979 Mar; 59(2-3):72-9. PubMed ID: 452842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Clinical and electrophysiological studies of the organ of hearing in newborn infants. II. Study of maturity of the auditory pathway by brain stem responses (ABR) in newborn infants].
    Reroń E
    Przegl Lek; 1990; 47(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 2236627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Physiological mechanisms in auditory brainstem-evoked response.
    Borg E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():11-22. PubMed ID: 6944767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.