These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35660872)

  • 21. Drivers' gaze patterns when resuming control with a head-up-display: Effects of automation level and time budget.
    Xu C; Louw TL; Merat N; Li P; Hu M; Li Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106905. PubMed ID: 36508949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of an exclusive narrow automated vehicle lane on adjacent lane driver behavior.
    Sohrabi A; Machiani SG; Jahangiri A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106931. PubMed ID: 36577244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.
    Jin M; Lu G; Chen F; Shi X; Tan H; Zhai J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106156. PubMed ID: 33957474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantifying drivers' visual perception to analyze accident-prone locations on two-lane mountain highways.
    Yu B; Chen Y; Bao S; Xu D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():122-130. PubMed ID: 30025353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A driving simulator study of driver performance on deceleration lanes.
    Calvi A; Benedetto A; De Blasiis MR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():195-203. PubMed ID: 22269501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preface to the special section on human factors and automation in vehicles: designing highly automated vehicles with the driver in mind.
    Merat N; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):681-6. PubMed ID: 23156614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of non-driving related tasks while operating automated driving systems (ADS): A systematic review.
    Hungund AP; Kumar Pradhan A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107076. PubMed ID: 37150132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.
    Shahini F; Park J; Welch K; Zahabi M
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):182-197. PubMed ID: 35451915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
    Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of assignments of dedicated automated vehicle lanes and inter-vehicle distances of automated vehicle platoons on car-following performance of nearby manual vehicle drivers.
    Chen F; Lu G; Tan H; Liu M; Wan H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106826. PubMed ID: 36081223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Consumer demand for partial driving automation and hands-free driving capability.
    Mueller AS; Cicchino JB; Calvanelli JV
    J Safety Res; 2023 Feb; 84():371-383. PubMed ID: 36868666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigation into passing behavior at passing zones to validate and extend the use of driving simulators in two-lane roads safety analysis.
    Karimi A; Bassani M; Boroujerdian AM; Catani L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 May; 139():105487. PubMed ID: 32135336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety.
    Jeong E; Oh C; Lee S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():115-124. PubMed ID: 28499140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An integrated architecture for intelligence evaluation of automated vehicles.
    Huang H; Zheng X; Yang Y; Liu J; Liu W; Wang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 145():105681. PubMed ID: 32712190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predicting driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.
    Du N; Zhou F; Pulver EM; Tilbury DM; Robert LP; Pradhan AK; Yang XJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105748. PubMed ID: 33099127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Driving Performance After Self-Regulated Control Transitions in Highly Automated Vehicles.
    Eriksson A; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Dec; 59(8):1233-1248. PubMed ID: 28902526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Li Z; Zhang H
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32316210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving.
    Du N; Yang XJ; Zhou F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105804. PubMed ID: 33128991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.