These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35661231)

  • 1. Testing the Relationship between Word Length, Frequency, and Predictability Based on the German Reference Corpus.
    Koplenig A; Kupietz M; Wolfer S
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Jun; 46(6):e13090. PubMed ID: 35661231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Challenges of Large-Scale, Web-Based Language Datasets: Word Length and Predictability Revisited.
    Meylan SC; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12983. PubMed ID: 34170030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.
    Fajardo I; Ávila V; Ferrer A; Tavares G; Gómez M; Hernández A
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2014 May; 27(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 23813583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Litkey Corpus: A richly annotated longitudinal corpus of German texts written by primary school children.
    Laarmann-Quante R; Ortmann K; Ehlert A; Masloch S; Scholz D; Belke E; Dipper S
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Aug; 51(4):1889-1918. PubMed ID: 31376074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word Order Typology Interacts With Linguistic Complexity: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus Study.
    Yadav H; Vaidya A; Shukla V; Husain S
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Apr; 44(4):e12822. PubMed ID: 32223024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. childLex: a lexical database of German read by children.
    Schroeder S; Würzner KM; Heister J; Geyken A; Kliegl R
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1085-1094. PubMed ID: 25319039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of word predictability on eye movements during Arabic reading.
    AlJassmi MA; Warrington KL; McGowan VA; White SJ; Paterson KB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):10-24. PubMed ID: 34632557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Beijing Sentence Corpus: A Chinese sentence corpus with eye movement data and predictability norms.
    Pan J; Yan M; Richter EM; Shu H; Kliegl R
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Aug; 54(4):1989-2000. PubMed ID: 34816386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.
    Albrengues C; Lavigne F; Aguilar C; Castet E; Vitu F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219666. PubMed ID: 31329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.
    Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting stuttering from linguistic factors for German speakers in two age groups.
    Dworzynski K; Howell P; Natke U
    J Fluency Disord; 2003; 28(2):95-112; quiz 112-3. PubMed ID: 12809747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The word frequency effect: a review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German.
    Brysbaert M; Buchmeier M; Conrad M; Jacobs AM; Bölte J; Böhl A
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(5):412-24. PubMed ID: 21768069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic.
    Smith NJ; Levy R
    Cognition; 2013 Sep; 128(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 23747651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing.
    Wang Y; Liu S; Afzal N; Rastegar-Mojarad M; Wang L; Shen F; Kingsbury P; Liu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Nov; 87():12-20. PubMed ID: 30217670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of orthographic consistency on eye movement behavior: German and English children and adults process the same words differently.
    Rau AK; Moll K; Snowling MJ; Landerl K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Feb; 130():92-105. PubMed ID: 25462034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Density and length in the neighborhood: Explaining cross-linguistic differences in learning to read in English and Dutch.
    Marinus E; Nation K; de Jong PF
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Nov; 139():127-47. PubMed ID: 26101877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corpora of Vietnamese texts: lexical effects of intended audience and publication place.
    Pham G; Kohnert K; Carney E
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Feb; 40(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 18411538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the language demands of informed consent documents in patient recruitment to cancer trials using tools from corpus and computational linguistics.
    Isaacs T; Murdoch J; Demjén Z; Stevenson F
    Health (London); 2022 Jul; 26(4):431-456. PubMed ID: 33045861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grammatical gender in spoken word recognition in German.
    Bölte J; Connine CM
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1018-32. PubMed ID: 15675648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [New standardized texts in Brazilian Portuguese to assess reading speed--comparison with four European languages].
    Messias A; Velasco e Cruz AA; Schallenmüller SJ; Trauzettel-Klosinski S
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 18797667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.